We should free leaf and root before returning from the error
handling code.

Signed-off-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

To resolve backrefs, ROOT_REPLACE operations in the tree mod log are
required to be tied to at least one KEY_REMOVE_WHILE_FREEING operation.
Therefore, those operations must be enclosed by tree_mod_log_write_lock()
and tree_mod_log_write_unlock() calls.

Those calls are private to the tree_mod_log_* functions, which means that
removal of the elements of an old root node must be logged from
tree_mod_log_insert_root. This partly reverts and corrects commit ba1bfbd5


(Btrfs: fix a tree mod logging issue for root replacement operations).

This fixes the brand-new version of xfstest 276 as of commit cfe73f71.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

Steps to reproduce:
	mkfs.btrfs <disk>
	mount <disk> <mnt>
	btrfs quota enable <mnt>
	btrfs sub create <mnt>/subv
	btrfs qgroup limit 10M <mnt>/subv
	fallocate --length 20M <mnt>/subv/data

For the above example, fallocating will return successfully which
is not expected, we try to fix it by doing qgroup reservation before
fallocating.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

If you restore a btrfs-image file system and try to mount that file system we'll
panic.  That's because btrfs-image restores and just makes one big chunk to
envelope the whole disk, since they are really only meant to be messed with by
our btrfs-progs.  So fix up btrfs_rmap_block and the callers of it for mount so
that we no longer panic but instead just return an error and fail to mount.
Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

Now that we use bit operation to check fs_state, update
btrfs_free_fs_root()'s checker, otherwise we get back to
memory leak case.

Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

Users report that an extent map's list is still linked when it's actually
going to be freed from cache.

The story is that

a) when we're going to drop an extent map and may split this large one into
smaller ems, and if this large one is flagged as EXTENT_FLAG_LOGGING which means
that it's on the list to be logged, then the smaller ems split from it will also
be flagged as EXTENT_FLAG_LOGGING, and this is _not_ expected.

b) we'll keep ems from unlinking the list and freeing when they are flagged with
EXTENT_FLAG_LOGGING, because the log code holds one reference.

The end result is the warning, but the truth is that we set the flag
EXTENT_FLAG_LOGGING only during fsync.

So clear flag EXTENT_FLAG_LOGGING for extent maps split from a large one.

Reported-by: Johannes Hirte <johannes.hirte@fem.tu-ilmenau.de>
Reported-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

Creating snapshot passes extent_root to commit its transaction,
but it can lead to the warning of checking root for quota in
the __btrfs_end_transaction() when someone else is committing
the current transaction.  Since we've recorded the needed root
in trans_handle, just use it to get rid of the warning.

Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

If one of qgroup fails to reserve firstly, we should return immediately,
it is unnecessary to continue check.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

The callers of lookup_inline_extent_info all handle getting an error back
properly, so return an error if we have corruption instead of being a jerk and
panicing.  Still WARN_ON() since this is kind of crucial and I've been seeing it
a bit too much recently for my taste, I think we're doing something wrong
somewhere.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

Doing this would reliably fail with -EBUSY for me:

# mount /dev/sdb2 /mnt/scratch; umount /mnt/scratch; mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb2
...
unable to open /dev/sdb2: Device or resource busy

because mkfs.btrfs tries to open the device O_EXCL, and somebody still has it.

Using systemtap to track bdev gets & puts shows a kworker thread doing a
blkdev put after mkfs attempts a get; this is left over from the unmount
path:

btrfs_close_devices
	__btrfs_close_devices
		call_rcu(&device->rcu, free_device);
			free_device
				INIT_WORK(&device->rcu_work, __free_device);
				schedule_work(&device->rcu_work);

so unmount might complete before __free_device fires & does its blkdev_put.

Adding an rcu_barrier() to btrfs_close_devices() causes unmount to wait
until all blkdev_put()s are done, and the device is truly free once
unmount completes.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

Remove a useless function declaration

Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

Using spinning case instead of blocking will result in better concurrency
overall.

Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

The delayed inode code batches up changes to the btree in hopes of doing
them in bulk.  As the changes build up, processes kick off worker
threads and wait for them to make progress.

The current code kicks off an async work queue item for each delayed
node, which creates a lot of churn.  It also uses a fixed 1 HZ waiting
period for the throttle, which allows us to build a lot of pending
work and can slow down the commit.

This changes us to watch a sequence counter as it is bumped during the
operations.  We kick off fewer work items and have each work item do
more work.

Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

Raid56 merge (merge commit e942f883

) had mistakenly removed a call to
__cancel_balance(), which resulted in balance not cleaning up after itself
after a successful finish.  (Cleanup includes switching the state, removing
the balance item and releasing mut_ex_op testnset lock.)  Bring it back.

Reported-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

Merge branch 'master' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/josef/btrfs-next into for-linus-3.9

Commit 24542bf7

 changed preallocation of
extents to cap the max size we try to allocate.  It's a valid change,
but the extent reservation code is also used by balance, and that
can't tolerate a smaller extent being allocated.

__btrfs_prealloc_file_range already has a min_size parameter, which is
used by relocation to request a specific extent size.  This commit
adds an extra check to enforce that minimum extent size.

Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Reported-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>

Commit 5ac00add

 added a testnset mutex and code that disallows
running administrative tasks in parallel. It is prevented that
the device add/delete/balance/replace/resize operations are
started in parallel. By mistake, the defragmentation operation
was included in the check for mutually exclusiveness as well.
This is fixed with this commit.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

Only let one trans handle to wait for other handles, otherwise we
will get ABBA issues.

Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

Btrfs balance can easily hit BUG_ON in these places, but we want
to it bail out gracefully after we force the whole filesystem to
readonly.  So we use btrfs_std_error hook in place of BUG_ON.

Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

We can bail out from here gracefully instead of a cold BUG_ON.

Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

We've missed the 'free blocks' part on ENOMEM error.

Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

We first use btrfs_std_error hook to replace with BUG_ON, and we
also need to cleanup what is left, including reloc roots rbtree
and reloc roots list.
Here we use a helper function to cleanup both rbtree and list, and
since this function can also be used in the balance recover path,
we also make the change as well to keep code simple.

Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

Add a check for NULL pointer to avoid invalid reference.

Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

If the async transaction commitment failed, we need close the
current transaction handler, or the current transaction will be
blocked to commit because of this orphan handler.

We fix the problem by doing sync transaction commitment, that is
to invoke btrfs_commit_transaction().

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

There are several bugs at error path of create_snapshot() when the
transaction commitment failed.
- access the freed transaction handler. At the end of the
  transaction commitment, the transaction handler was freed, so we
  should not access it after the transaction commitment.
- we were not aware of the error which happened during the snapshot
  creation if we submitted a async transaction commitment.
- pending snapshot access vs pending snapshot free. when something
  wrong happened after we submitted a async transaction commitment,
  the transaction committer would cleanup the pending snapshots and
  free them. But the snapshot creators were not aware of it, they
  would access the freed pending snapshots.

This patch fixes the above problems by:
- remove the dangerous code that accessed the freed handler
- assign ->error if the error happens during the snapshot creation
- the transaction committer doesn't free the pending snapshots,
  just assigns the error number and evicts them before we unblock
  the transaction.

Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

We need to inc the nlink of deleted entries when running replay so we can do the
unlink on the fs_root and get everything cleaned up and then have the orphan
cleanup do the right thing.  The problem is inc_nlink complains about this, even
thought it still does the right thing.  So use set_nlink() if our i_nlink is 0
to keep users from seeing the warnings during log replay.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

tilegx_defconfig:

fs/btrfs/raid56.c: In function 'btrfs_alloc_stripe_hash_table':
fs/btrfs/raid56.c:206:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'vzalloc' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
fs/btrfs/raid56.c:206:9: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast [enabled by default]
fs/btrfs/raid56.c:226:4: error: implicit declaration of function 'vfree' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

We want to avoid module.h where posible, since it in turn includes
nearly all of header space.  This means removing it where it is not
required, and using export.h where we are only exporting symbols via
EXPORT_SYMBOL and friends.

Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

Apparently when we do inline extents we allow the data to overlap the last chunk
of the btrfs_file_extent_item, which means that we can possibly have a
btrfs_file_extent_item that isn't actually as large as a btrfs_file_extent_item.
This messes with us when we try to overwrite the extent when logging new extents
since we expect for it to be the right size.  To fix this just delete the item
and try to do the insert again which will give us the proper sized
btrfs_file_extent_item.  This fixes a panic where map_private_extent_buffer
would blow up because we're trying to write past the end of the leaf.  Thanks,

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

The stripe hash table is large, starting with allocation order 4 and can go as
high as order 7 in case lock debugging is turned on and structure padding
happens.

Observed mount failure:

mount: page allocation failure: order:7, mode:0x200050
Pid: 8234, comm: mount Tainted: G        W    3.8.0-default+ #267
Call Trace:
 [<ffffffff81114353>] warn_alloc_failed+0xf3/0x140
 [<ffffffff811171d2>] ? __alloc_pages_direct_compact+0x92/0x250
 [<ffffffff81117ac3>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x733/0x9d0
 [<ffffffff81152878>] ? cache_alloc_refill+0x3f8/0x840
 [<ffffffff811528bc>] cache_alloc_refill+0x43c/0x840
 [<ffffffff811302eb>] ? is_kernel_percpu_address+0x4b/0x90
 [<ffffffffa00a00ac>] ? btrfs_alloc_stripe_hash_table+0x5c/0x130 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffff811531d7>] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x247/0x270
 [<ffffffffa00a00ac>] btrfs_alloc_stripe_hash_table+0x5c/0x130 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffffa003133f>] open_ctree+0xb2f/0x1f90 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffff81397289>] ? string+0x49/0xe0
 [<ffffffff813987b3>] ? vsnprintf+0x443/0x5d0
 [<ffffffffa0007cb6>] btrfs_mount+0x526/0x600 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffff8115127c>] ? cache_alloc_debugcheck_after+0x4c/0x200
 [<ffffffff81162b90>] mount_fs+0x20/0xe0
 [<ffffffff8117db26>] vfs_kern_mount+0x76/0x120
 [<ffffffff811801b6>] do_mount+0x386/0x980
 [<ffffffff8112a5cb>] ? strndup_user+0x5b/0x80
 [<ffffffff81180840>] sys_mount+0x90/0xe0
 [<ffffffff81962e99>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

The original code is a little confusing and not clear, The right
way to deal with the kernel code like this:
		[...]
		if (ret)
			goto out;
		[...]

So i move the common clean_up code to the place labeled with
out_fail, this will be easier to maintain.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

commit eb6b88d9

 leads into another bug.
If it is just because qgroup_reserve fails, the function btrfs_qgroup_free
should not be called, otherwise, it will cause the wrong quota accounting.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

The check work has been done just before the function btrfs_clean_quota_tree
is called, it is not necessary to check it again, remove it.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

Return ENOMEM rather trigger BUG_ON, fix it.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

Steps to reproduce:

	i=0
	ncases=100

	mkfs.btrfs <disk>
	mount <disk> <mnt>
	btrfs quota enable <mnt>
	btrfs qgroup create 2/1 <mnt>
	while [ $i -le $ncases ]
	do
		btrfs qgroup create 1/$i <mnt>
		btrfs qgroup assign 1/$i 2/1 <mnt>
		i=$(($i+1))
	done

	btrfs quota disable <mnt>
	umount <mnt>
	btrfsck <mnt>

You can also use the commands:
	btrfs-debug-tree <disk> | grep QGROUP

You will find there are still items existed.The reasons why this happens
is because the original code just checks slots[0]==0 and returns.
We try to fix it by deleting the leaf one by one.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

The nodesize is capped at 64k and there are enough pages preallocated in
extent_buffer::inline_pages. The fallback to kmalloc never happened
because even on the smallest page size considered (4k) inline_pages
covered the needs.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

When deleting a snapshot/subvolume, we need remove root ref/backref,
dir entries and update the dir inode, so we must reserve free space
for those operations.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

There are two problems in the space reservation of the snapshot/
subvolume creation.
- don't reserve the space for the root item insertion
- the space which is reserved in the qgroup is different with
  the free space reservation. we need reserve free space for
  7 items, but in qgroup reservation, we need reserve space only
  for 3 items.

So we implement new metadata reservation functions for the
snapshot/subvolume creation.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

Since we have grabbed the parent inode at the beginning of the
snapshot creation, and both sync and async snapshot creation
release it after the pending snapshots are actually created,
it is safe to access the parent inode directly during the snapshot
creation, we needn't use dget_parent/dput to fix the parent dentry
and get the dir inode.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

Dave pointed out that he saw messages from btrfs although there was no
such filesystem on his computers. The automatic device scan is called on
every new blockdevice if the usual distro udev rule set is used. The
printk introduced in 6f60cbd3

 was a remainder from copying
portions of code from btrfs_get_bdev_and_sb which is used under
different conditions and the warning makes sense there.

Reported-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>