This commit implements the delayed release logic for bpf_list_push_front
and bpf_list_push_back.

Once a node has been added to the list, it's pointer changes to
PTR_UNTRUSTED. However, it is only released once the lock protecting the
list is unlocked. For such PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_ALLOC with PTR_UNTRUSTED
set but an active ref_obj_id, it is still permitted to read them as long
as the lock is held. Writing to them is not allowed.

This allows having read access to push items we no longer own until we
release the lock guarding the list, allowing a little more flexibility
when working with these APIs.

Note that enabling write support has fairly tricky interactions with
what happens inside the critical section. Just as an example, currently,
bpf_obj_drop is not permitted, but if it were, being able to write to
the PTR_UNTRUSTED pointer while the object gets released back to the
memory allocator would violate safety properties we wish to guarantee
(i.e. not crashing the kernel). The memory could be reused for a
different type in the BPF program or even in the kernel as it gets
eventually kfree'd.

Not enabling bpf_obj_drop inside the critical section would appear to
prevent all of the above, but that is more of an artifical limitation
right now. Since the write support is tangled with how we handle
potential aliasing of nodes inside the critical section that may or may
not be part of the list anymore, it has been deferred to a future patch.

Acked-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118015614.2013203-18-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

Add a linked list API for use in BPF programs, where it expects
protection from the bpf_spin_lock in the same allocation as the
bpf_list_head. For now, only one bpf_spin_lock can be present hence that
is assumed to be the one protecting the bpf_list_head.

The following functions are added to kick things off:

// Add node to beginning of list
void bpf_list_push_front(struct bpf_list_head *head, struct bpf_list_node *node);

// Add node to end of list
void bpf_list_push_back(struct bpf_list_head *head, struct bpf_list_node *node);

// Remove node at beginning of list and return it
struct bpf_list_node *bpf_list_pop_front(struct bpf_list_head *head);

// Remove node at end of list and return it
struct bpf_list_node *bpf_list_pop_back(struct bpf_list_head *head);

The lock protecting the bpf_list_head needs to be taken for all
operations. The verifier ensures that the lock that needs to be taken is
always held, and only the correct lock is taken for these operations.
These checks are made statically by relying on the reg->id preserved for
registers pointing into regions having both bpf_spin_lock and the
objects protected by it. The comment over check_reg_allocation_locked in
this change describes the logic in detail.

Note that bpf_list_push_front and bpf_list_push_back are meant to
consume the object containing the node in the 1st argument, however that
specific mechanism is intended to not release the ref_obj_id directly
until the bpf_spin_unlock is called. In this commit, nothing is done,
but the next commit will be introducing logic to handle this case, so it
has been left as is for now.

bpf_list_pop_front and bpf_list_pop_back delete the first or last item
of the list respectively, and return pointer to the element at the
list_node offset. The user can then use container_of style macro to get
the actual entry type. The verifier however statically knows the actual
type, so the safety properties are still preserved.

With these additions, programs can now manage their own linked lists and
store their objects in them.

Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118015614.2013203-17-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

Pointer increment on seeing PTR_MAYBE_NULL is already protected against,
hence make an exception for PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_ALLOC while still
keeping the warning for other unintended cases that might creep in.

bpf_list_pop_{front,_back} helpers planned to be introduced in next
commit will return a MEM_ALLOC register with incremented offset pointing
to bpf_list_node field. The user is supposed to then obtain the pointer
to the entry using container_of after NULL checking it. The current
restrictions trigger a warning when doing the NULL checking. Revisiting
the reason, it is meant as an assertion which seems to actually work and
catch the bad case.

Hence, under no other circumstances can reg->off be non-zero for a
register that has the PTR_MAYBE_NULL type flag set.

Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118015614.2013203-16-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

Introduce bpf_obj_drop, which is the kfunc used to free allocated
objects (allocated using bpf_obj_new). Pairing with bpf_obj_new, it
implicitly destructs the fields part of object automatically without
user intervention.

Just like the previous patch, btf_struct_meta that is needed to free up
the special fields is passed as a hidden argument to the kfunc.

For the user, a convenience macro hides over the kernel side kfunc which
is named bpf_obj_drop_impl.

Continuing the previous example:

void prog(void) {
	struct foo *f;

	f = bpf_obj_new(typeof(*f));
	if (!f)
		return;
	bpf_obj_drop(f);
}

Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118015614.2013203-15-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

Introduce type safe memory allocator bpf_obj_new for BPF programs. The
kernel side kfunc is named bpf_obj_new_impl, as passing hidden arguments
to kfuncs still requires having them in prototype, unlike BPF helpers
which always take 5 arguments and have them checked using bpf_func_proto
in verifier, ignoring unset argument types.

Introduce __ign suffix to ignore a specific kfunc argument during type
checks, then use this to introduce support for passing type metadata to
the bpf_obj_new_impl kfunc.

The user passes BTF ID of the type it wants to allocates in program BTF,
the verifier then rewrites the first argument as the size of this type,
after performing some sanity checks (to ensure it exists and it is a
struct type).

The second argument is also fixed up and passed by the verifier. This is
the btf_struct_meta for the type being allocated. It would be needed
mostly for the offset array which is required for zero initializing
special fields while leaving the rest of storage in unitialized state.

It would also be needed in the next patch to perform proper destruction
of the object's special fields.

Under the hood, bpf_obj_new will call bpf_mem_alloc and bpf_mem_free,
using the any context BPF memory allocator introduced recently. To this
end, a global instance of the BPF memory allocator is initialized on
boot to be used for this purpose. This 'bpf_global_ma' serves all
allocations for bpf_obj_new. In the future, bpf_obj_new variants will
allow specifying a custom allocator.

Note that now that bpf_obj_new can be used to allocate objects that can
be linked to BPF linked list (when future linked list helpers are
available), we need to also free the elements using bpf_mem_free.
However, since the draining of elements is done outside the
bpf_spin_lock, we need to do migrate_disable around the call since
bpf_list_head_free can be called from map free path where migration is
enabled. Otherwise, when called from BPF programs migration is already
disabled.

A convenience macro is included in the bpf_experimental.h header to hide
over the ugly details of the implementation, leading to user code
looking similar to a language level extension which allocates and
constructs fields of a user type.

struct bar {
	struct bpf_list_node node;
};

struct foo {
	struct bpf_spin_lock lock;
	struct bpf_list_head head __contains(bar, node);
};

void prog(void) {
	struct foo *f;

	f = bpf_obj_new(typeof(*f));
	if (!f)
		return;
	...
}

A key piece of this story is still missing, i.e. the free function,
which will come in the next patch.

Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118015614.2013203-14-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

Allow passing known constant scalars as arguments to kfuncs that do not
represent a size parameter. We use mark_chain_precision for the constant
scalar argument to mark it precise. This makes the search pruning
optimization of verifier more conservative for such kfunc calls, and
each non-distinct argument is considered unequivalent.

We will use this support to then expose a bpf_obj_new function where it
takes the local type ID of a type in program BTF, and returns a
PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_ALLOC to the local type, and allows programs to
allocate their own objects.

Each type ID resolves to a distinct type with a possibly distinct size,
hence the type ID constant matters in terms of program safety and its
precision needs to be checked between old and cur states inside regsafe.
The use of mark_chain_precision enables this.

Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118015614.2013203-13-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

As we continue to add more features, argument types, kfunc flags, and
different extensions to kfuncs, the code to verify the correctness of
the kfunc prototype wrt the passed in registers has become ad-hoc and
ugly to read. To make life easier, and make a very clear split between
different stages of argument processing, move all the code into
verifier.c and refactor into easier to read helpers and functions.

This also makes sharing code within the verifier easier with kfunc
argument processing. This will be more and more useful in later patches
as we are now moving to implement very core BPF helpers as kfuncs, to
keep them experimental before baking into UAPI.

Remove all kfunc related bits now from btf_check_func_arg_match, as
users have been converted away to refactored kfunc argument handling.

Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118015614.2013203-12-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

There is no need to restrict users from locking bpf_spin_lock in map
values of inner maps. Each inner map lookup gets a unique reg->id
assigned to the returned PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE which will be preserved after
the NULL check. Distinct lookups into different inner map get unique
IDs, and distinct lookups into same inner map also get unique IDs.

Hence, lift the restriction by removing the check return -ENOTSUPP in
map_in_map.c. Later commits will add comprehensive test cases to ensure
that invalid cases are rejected.

Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118015614.2013203-11-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

Global variables reside in maps accessible using direct_value_addr
callbacks, so giving each load instruction's rewrite a unique reg->id
disallows us from holding locks which are global.

The reason for preserving reg->id as a unique value for registers that
may point to spin lock is that two separate lookups are treated as two
separate memory regions, and any possible aliasing is ignored for the
purposes of spin lock correctness.

This is not great especially for the global variable case, which are
served from maps that have max_entries == 1, i.e. they always lead to
map values pointing into the same map value.

So refactor the active_spin_lock into a 'active_lock' structure which
represents the lock identity, and instead of the reg->id, remember two
fields, a pointer and the reg->id. The pointer will store reg->map_ptr
or reg->btf. It's only necessary to distinguish for the id == 0 case of
global variables, but always setting the pointer to a non-NULL value and
using the pointer to check whether the lock is held simplifies code in
the verifier.

This is generic enough to allow it for global variables, map lookups,
and allocated objects at the same time.

Note that while whether a lock is held can be answered by just comparing
active_lock.ptr to NULL, to determine whether the register is pointing
to the same held lock requires comparing _both_ ptr and id.

Finally, as a result of this refactoring, pseudo load instructions are
not given a unique reg->id, as they are doing lookup for the same map
value (max_entries is never greater than 1).

Essentially, we consider that the tuple of (ptr, id) will always be
unique for any kind of argument to bpf_spin_{lock,unlock}.

Note that this can be extended in the future to also remember offset
used for locking, so that we can introduce multiple bpf_spin_lock fields
in the same allocation.

Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118015614.2013203-10-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

Allow locking a bpf_spin_lock in an allocated object, in addition to
already supported map value pointers. The handling is similar to that of
map values, by just preserving the reg->id of PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_ALLOC
as well, and adjusting process_spin_lock to work with them and remember
the id in verifier state.

Refactor the existing process_spin_lock to work with PTR_TO_BTF_ID |
MEM_ALLOC in addition to PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE. We need to update the
reg_may_point_to_spin_lock which is used in mark_ptr_or_null_reg to
preserve reg->id, that will be used in env->cur_state->active_spin_lock
to remember the currently held spin lock.

Also update the comment describing bpf_spin_lock implementation details
to also talk about PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_ALLOC type.

Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118015614.2013203-9-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

Ensure that there can be no ownership cycles among different types by
way of having owning objects that can hold some other type as their
element. For instance, a map value can only hold allocated objects, but
these are allowed to have another bpf_list_head. To prevent unbounded
recursion while freeing resources, elements of bpf_list_head in local
kptrs can never have a bpf_list_head which are part of list in a map
value. Later patches will verify this by having dedicated BTF selftests.

Also, to make runtime destruction easier, once btf_struct_metas is fully
populated, we can stash the metadata of the value type directly in the
metadata of the list_head fields, as that allows easier access to the
value type's layout to destruct it at runtime from the btf_field entry
of the list head itself.

Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118015614.2013203-8-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

Allow specifying bpf_spin_lock, bpf_list_head, bpf_list_node fields in a
allocated object.

Also update btf_struct_access to reject direct access to these special
fields.

A bpf_list_head allows implementing map-in-map style use cases, where an
allocated object with bpf_list_head is linked into a list in a map
value. This would require embedding a bpf_list_node, support for which
is also included. The bpf_spin_lock is used to protect the bpf_list_head
and other data.

While we strictly don't require to hold a bpf_spin_lock while touching
the bpf_list_head in such objects, as when have access to it, we have
complete ownership of the object, the locking constraint is still kept
and may be conditionally lifted in the future.

Note that the specification of such types can be done just like map
values, e.g.:

struct bar {
	struct bpf_list_node node;
};

struct foo {
	struct bpf_spin_lock lock;
	struct bpf_list_head head __contains(bar, node);
	struct bpf_list_node node;
};

struct map_value {
	struct bpf_spin_lock lock;
	struct bpf_list_head head __contains(foo, node);
};

To recognize such types in user BTF, we build a btf_struct_metas array
of metadata items corresponding to each BTF ID. This is done once during
the btf_parse stage to avoid having to do it each time during the
verification process's requirement to inspect the metadata.

Moreover, the computed metadata needs to be passed to some helpers in
future patches which requires allocating them and storing them in the
BTF that is pinned by the program itself, so that valid access can be
assumed to such data during program runtime.

A key thing to note is that once a btf_struct_meta is available for a
type, both the btf_record and btf_field_offs should be available. It is
critical that btf_field_offs is available in case special fields are
present, as we extensively rely on special fields being zeroed out in
map values and allocated objects in later patches. The code ensures that
by bailing out in case of errors and ensuring both are available
together. If the record is not available, the special fields won't be
recognized, so not having both is also fine (in terms of being a
verification error and not a runtime bug).

Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118015614.2013203-7-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

Introduce support for representing pointers to objects allocated by the
BPF program, i.e. PTR_TO_BTF_ID that point to a type in program BTF.
This is indicated by the presence of MEM_ALLOC type flag in reg->type to
avoid having to check btf_is_kernel when trying to match argument types
in helpers.

Whenever walking such types, any pointers being walked will always yield
a SCALAR instead of pointer. In the future we might permit kptr inside
such allocated objects (either kernel or program allocated), and it will
then form a PTR_TO_BTF_ID of the respective type.

For now, such allocated objects will always be referenced in verifier
context, hence ref_obj_id == 0 for them is a bug. It is allowed to write
to such objects, as long fields that are special are not touched
(support for which will be added in subsequent patches). Note that once
such a pointer is marked PTR_UNTRUSTED, it is no longer allowed to write
to it.

No PROBE_MEM handling is therefore done for loads into this type unless
PTR_UNTRUSTED is part of the register type, since they can never be in
an undefined state, and their lifetime will always be valid.

Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118015614.2013203-6-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

Far too much code simply assumes that both btf_record and btf_field_offs
are set to valid pointers together, or both are unset. They go together
hand in hand as btf_record describes the special fields and
btf_field_offs is compact representation for runtime copying/zeroing.

It is very difficult to make this clear in the code when the only
exception to this universal invariant is inner_map_meta which is used
as reg->map_ptr in the verifier. This is simply a bug waiting to happen,
as in verifier context we cannot easily distinguish if PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE
is coming from an inner map, and if we ever end up using field_offs for
any reason in the future, we will silently ignore the special fields for
inner map case (as NULL is not an error but unset field_offs).

Hence, simply copy field_offs from inner map together with btf_record.

While at it, refactor code to unwind properly on errors with gotos.

Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118015614.2013203-5-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

Whenever btf_record_dup fails, we must free inner_map_meta that was
allocated before.

This fixes a memory leak (in case of errors) during inner map creation.

Fixes: aa3496ac

 ("bpf: Refactor kptr_off_tab into btf_record")
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118015614.2013203-4-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

Since the commit being fixed, we now miss freeing btf_record for local
storage maps which will have a btf_record populated in case they have
bpf_spin_lock element.

This was missed because I made the choice of offloading the job to free
kptr_off_tab (now btf_record) to the map_free callback when adding
support for kptrs.

Revisiting the reason for this decision, there is the possibility that
the btf_record gets used inside map_free callback (e.g. in case of maps
embedding kptrs) to iterate over them and free them, hence doing it
before the map_free callback would be leaking special field memory, and
do invalid memory access. The btf_record keeps module references which
is critical to ensure the dtor call made for referenced kptr is safe to
do.

If doing it after map_free callback, the map area is already freed, so
we cannot access bpf_map structure anymore.

To fix this and prevent such lapses in future, move bpf_map_free_record
out of the map_free callback, and do it after map_free by remembering
the btf_record pointer. There is no need to access bpf_map structure in
that case, and we can avoid missing this case when support for new map
types is added for other special fields.

Since a btf_record and its btf_field_offs are used together, for
consistency delay freeing of field_offs as well. While not a problem
right now, a lot of code assumes that either both record and field_offs
are set or none at once.

Note that in case of map of maps (outer maps), inner_map_meta->record is
only used during verification, not to free fields in map value, hence we
simply keep the bpf_map_free_record call as is in bpf_map_meta_free and
never touch map->inner_map_meta in bpf_map_free_deferred.

Add a comment making note of these details.

Fixes: db559117

 ("bpf: Consolidate spin_lock, timer management into btf_record")
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118015614.2013203-3-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

Instead of returning directly with -EOPNOTSUPP for the timer case, we
need to free the btf_record before returning to userspace.

Fixes: db559117

 ("bpf: Consolidate spin_lock, timer management into btf_record")
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118015614.2013203-2-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

When cross-compiling [1], the get_sys_includes make macro should use
the target system include path, and not the build hosts system include
path.

Make clang honor the CROSS_COMPILE triple.

[1] e.g. "ARCH=riscv CROSS_COMPILE=riscv64-linux-gnu- make"

Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221115182051.582962-2-bjorn@kernel.org

When cross-compiling selftests/bpf, the resolve_btfids binary end up
in a different directory, than the regular resolve_btfids
builds. Populate RESOLVE_BTFIDS for sub-make, so it can find the
binary.

Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221115182051.582962-1-bjorn@kernel.org

Currently bpf_map_do_batch() first invokes fdget(batch.map_fd) to get
the target map file, then it invokes generic_map_update_batch() to do
batch update. generic_map_update_batch() will get the target map file
by using fdget(batch.map_fd) again and pass it to bpf_map_update_value().

The problem is map file returned by the second fdget() may be NULL or a
totally different file compared by map file in bpf_map_do_batch(). The
reason is that the first fdget() only guarantees the liveness of struct
file instead of file descriptor and the file description may be released
by concurrent close() through pick_file().

It doesn't incur any problem as for now, because maps with batch update
support don't use map file in .map_fd_get_ptr() ops. But it is better to
fix the potential access of an invalid map file.

Using __bpf_map_get() again in generic_map_update_batch() can not fix
the problem, because batch.map_fd may be closed and reopened, and the
returned map file may be different with map file got in
bpf_map_do_batch(), so just passing the map file directly to
.map_update_batch() in bpf_map_do_batch().

Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221116075059.1551277-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com

Commit 26a9b433 ("bpf/docs: Document how to run CI without patch
submission") caused a warning to be generated when compiling the
documentation:

 > bpf_devel_QA.rst:55: WARNING: Unexpected indentation.
 > bpf_devel_QA.rst:56: WARNING: Block quote ends without a blank line

This change fixes the problem by inserting the required blank lines.

Fixes: 26a9b433

 ("bpf/docs: Document how to run CI without patch submission")
Reported-by: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Müller <deso@posteo.net>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221116174358.2744613-1-deso@posteo.net

kmemleak reports this issue:

unreferenced object 0xffff88810b7835c0 (size 32):
  comm "test_progs", pid 270, jiffies 4294969007 (age 1621.315s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
    03 00 00 00 03 00 00 00 0f 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
  backtrace:
    [<00000000376cdeab>] kmalloc_trace+0x27/0x110
    [<000000003bcdb3b6>] selinux_sk_alloc_security+0x66/0x110
    [<000000003959008f>] security_sk_alloc+0x47/0x80
    [<00000000e7bc6668>] sk_prot_alloc+0xbd/0x1a0
    [<0000000002d6343a>] sk_alloc+0x3b/0x940
    [<000000009812a46d>] unix_create1+0x8f/0x3d0
    [<000000005ed0976b>] unix_create+0xa1/0x150
    [<0000000086a1d27f>] __sock_create+0x233/0x4a0
    [<00000000cffe3a73>] __sys_socket_create.part.0+0xaa/0x110
    [<0000000007c63f20>] __sys_socket+0x49/0xf0
    [<00000000b08753c8>] __x64_sys_socket+0x42/0x50
    [<00000000b56e26b3>] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90
    [<000000009b4871b8>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

The issue occurs in the following scenarios:

unix_create1()
  sk_alloc()
    sk_prot_alloc()
      security_sk_alloc()
        call_int_hook()
          hlist_for_each_entry()
            entry1->hook.sk_alloc_security
            <-- selinux_sk_alloc_security() succeeded,
            <-- sk->security alloced here.
            entry2->hook.sk_alloc_security
            <-- bpf_lsm_sk_alloc_security() failed
      goto out_free;
        ...    <-- the sk->security not freed, memleak

The core problem is that the LSM is not yet fully stacked (work is
actively going on in this space) which means that some LSM hooks do
not support multiple LSMs at the same time. To fix, skip the
"EPERM" test when it runs in the environments that already have
non-bpf lsms installed

Fixes: dca85aac

 ("selftests/bpf: lsm_cgroup functional test")
Signed-off-by: Wang Yufen <wangyufen@huawei.com>
Cc: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1668482980-16163-1-git-send-email-wangyufen@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>

Enable unprivileged bpf for selftests kernel by default.
This forces CI to run test_verifier tests in both privileged
and unprivileged modes.

The test_verifier.c:do_test uses sysctl kernel.unprivileged_bpf_disabled
to decide whether to run or to skip test cases in unprivileged mode.
The CONFIG_BPF_UNPRIV_DEFAULT_OFF controls the default value of the
kernel.unprivileged_bpf_disabled.

Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221116015456.2461135-1-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

If the parameters for batch are more than 2, check argc first can
return immediately, no need to use is_prefix() to check "file" with
a little overhead and then check argc, it is better to check "file"
only when the parameters for batch are 2.

Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1668517207-11822-1-git-send-email-yangtiezhu@loongson.cn
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

Remove mistaken & from code example in MAP_TYPE_ARRAY docs

Fixes: 1cfa97b3

 ("bpf, docs: Document BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY")
Signed-off-by: Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221115095910.86407-1-donald.hunter@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

Eduard Zingerman says:

====================

This patchset adds ability to propagates nullness information for
branches of register to register equality compare instructions. The
following rules are used:
 - suppose register A maybe null
 - suppose register B is not null
 - for JNE A, B, ... - A is not null in the false branch
 - for JEQ A, B, ... - A is not null in the true branch

E.g. for program like below:

  r6 = skb->sk;
  r7 = sk_fullsock(r6);
  r0 = sk_fullsock(r6);
  if (r0 == 0) return 0;    (a)
  if (r0 != r7) return 0;   (b)
  *r7->type;                (c)
  return 0;

It is safe to dereference r7 at point (c), because of (a) and (b).

The utility of this change came up while working on BPF CLang backend
issue [1]. Specifically, while debugging issue with selftest
`test_sk_lookup.c`. This test has the following structure:

    int access_ctx_sk(struct bpf_sk_lookup *ctx __CTX__)
    {
        struct bpf_sock *sk1 = NULL, *sk2 = NULL;
        ...
        sk1 = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&redir_map, &KEY_SERVER_A);
        if (!sk1)           // (a)
            goto out;
        ...
        if (ctx->sk != sk1) // (b)
            goto out;
        ...
        if (ctx->sk->family != AF_INET ||     // (c)
            ctx->sk->type != SOCK_STREAM ||
            ctx->sk->state != BPF_TCP_LISTEN)
            goto out;
            ...
    }

- at (a) `sk1` is checked to be not null;
- at (b) `ctx->sk` is verified to be equal to `sk1`;
- at (c) `ctx->sk` is accessed w/o nullness check.

Currently Global Value Numbering pass considers expressions `sk1` and
`ctx->sk` to be identical at point (c) and replaces `ctx->sk` with
`sk1` (not expressions themselves but corresponding SSA values).
Since `sk1` is known to be not null after (b) verifier allows
execution of the program.

However, such optimization is not guaranteed to happen. When it does
not happen verifier reports an error.

Changelog:
v2 -> v3:
 - verifier tests are updated with correct error message for
   unprivileged mode (pointer comparisons are forbidden in
   unprivileged mode).

v1 -> v2:
 - after investigation described in [2] as suggested by John, Daniel
   and Shung-Hsi, function `type_is_pointer` is removed, calls to this
   function are replaced by `__is_pointer_value(false, src_reg)`.

RFC -> v1:
 - newly added if block in `check_cond_jmp_op` is moved down to keep
   `make_ptr_not_null_reg` actions together;
 - tests rewritten to have a single `r0 = 0; exit;` block.

[1]   https://reviews.llvm.org/D131633#3722231
[2]   https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/bad8be826d088e0d180232628160bf932006de89.camel@gmail.com/
[RFC] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220822094312.175448-1-eddyz87@gmail.com/
[v1]  https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220826172915.1536914-1-eddyz87@gmail.com/
[v2]  https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221106214921.117631-1-eddyz87@gmail.com/
====================

Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

Verify that nullness information is porpagated in the branches of
register to register JEQ and JNE operations.

Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221115224859.2452988-3-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

Propagate nullness information for branches of register to register
equality compare instructions. The following rules are used:
- suppose register A maybe null
- suppose register B is not null
- for JNE A, B, ... - A is not null in the false branch
- for JEQ A, B, ... - A is not null in the true branch

E.g. for program like below:

  r6 = skb->sk;
  r7 = sk_fullsock(r6);
  r0 = sk_fullsock(r6);
  if (r0 == 0) return 0;    (a)
  if (r0 != r7) return 0;   (b)
  *r7->type;                (c)
  return 0;

It is safe to dereference r7 at point (c), because of (a) and (b).

Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221115224859.2452988-2-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

For queueing packets in XDP we want to add a new redirect map type with
support for 64-bit indexes. To prepare fore this, expand the width of the
'key' argument to the bpf_redirect_map() helper. Since BPF registers are
always 64-bit, this should be safe to do after the fact.

Acked-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221108140601.149971-3-toke@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

Move the received_rps counter value next to the other RPS-related members
in softnet_data. This closes two four-byte holes in the structure, making
room for another pointer in the first two cache lines without bumping the
xmit struct to its own line.

Acked-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221108140601.149971-2-toke@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

This change documents the process for running the BPF CI before
submitting a patch to the upstream mailing list, similar to what happens
if a patch is send to bpf@vger.kernel.org: it builds kernel and
selftests and runs the latter on different architecture (but it notably
does not cover stylistic checks such as cover letter verification).

Running BPF CI this way can help achieve better test coverage ahead of
patch submission than merely running locally (say, using
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/vmtest.sh), as additional architectures may
be covered as well.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Müller <deso@posteo.net>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221114211501.2068684-1-deso@posteo.net

Instead of having to pass multiple arguments that describe the register,
pass the bpf_reg_state into the btf_struct_access callback. Currently,
all call sites simply reuse the btf and btf_id of the reg they want to
check the access of. The only exception to this pattern is the callsite
in check_ptr_to_map_access, hence for that case create a dummy reg to
simulate PTR_TO_BTF_ID access.

Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221114191547.1694267-8-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

Currently, verifier uses MEM_ALLOC type tag to specially tag memory
returned from bpf_ringbuf_reserve helper. However, this is currently
only used for this purpose and there is an implicit assumption that it
only refers to ringbuf memory (e.g. the check for ARG_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM
in check_func_arg_reg_off).

Hence, rename MEM_ALLOC to MEM_RINGBUF to indicate this special
relationship and instead open the use of MEM_ALLOC for more generic
allocations made for user types.

Also, since ARG_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM_OR_NULL is unused, simply drop it.

Finally, update selftests using 'alloc_' verifier string to 'ringbuf_'.

Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221114191547.1694267-7-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

Currently, the verifier has two return types, RET_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM, and
RET_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM_OR_NULL, however the former is confusingly named to
imply that it carries MEM_ALLOC, while only the latter does. This causes
confusion during code review leading to conclusions like that the return
value of RET_PTR_TO_DYNPTR_MEM_OR_NULL (which is RET_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM |
PTR_MAYBE_NULL) may be consumable by bpf_ringbuf_{submit,commit}.

Rename it to make it clear MEM_ALLOC needs to be tacked on top of
RET_PTR_TO_MEM.

Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221114191547.1694267-6-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

Add the support on the map side to parse, recognize, verify, and build
metadata table for a new special field of the type struct bpf_list_head.
To parameterize the bpf_list_head for a certain value type and the
list_node member it will accept in that value type, we use BTF
declaration tags.

The definition of bpf_list_head in a map value will be done as follows:

struct foo {
	struct bpf_list_node node;
	int data;
};

struct map_value {
	struct bpf_list_head head __contains(foo, node);
};

Then, the bpf_list_head only allows adding to the list 'head' using the
bpf_list_node 'node' for the type struct foo.

The 'contains' annotation is a BTF declaration tag composed of four
parts, "contains:name:node" where the name is then used to look up the
type in the map BTF, with its kind hardcoded to BTF_KIND_STRUCT during
the lookup. The node defines name of the member in this type that has
the type struct bpf_list_node, which is actually used for linking into
the linked list. For now, 'kind' part is hardcoded as struct.

This allows building intrusive linked lists in BPF, using container_of
to obtain pointer to entry, while being completely type safe from the
perspective of the verifier. The verifier knows exactly the type of the
nodes, and knows that list helpers return that type at some fixed offset
where the bpf_list_node member used for this list exists. The verifier
also uses this information to disallow adding types that are not
accepted by a certain list.

For now, no elements can be added to such lists. Support for that is
coming in future patches, hence draining and freeing items is done with
a TODO that will be resolved in a future patch.

Note that the bpf_list_head_free function moves the list out to a local
variable under the lock and releases it, doing the actual draining of
the list items outside the lock. While this helps with not holding the
lock for too long pessimizing other concurrent list operations, it is
also necessary for deadlock prevention: unless every function called in
the critical section would be notrace, a fentry/fexit program could
attach and call bpf_map_update_elem again on the map, leading to the
same lock being acquired if the key matches and lead to a deadlock.
While this requires some special effort on part of the BPF programmer to
trigger and is highly unlikely to occur in practice, it is always better
if we can avoid such a condition.

While notrace would prevent this, doing the draining outside the lock
has advantages of its own, hence it is used to also fix the deadlock
related problem.

Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221114191547.1694267-5-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

The current offset needs to also skip over the already copied region in
addition to the size of the next field. This case manifests where there
are gaps between adjacent special fields.

It was observed that for a map value with size 48, having fields at:
off:  0, 16, 32
size: 4, 16, 16

The current code does:

memcpy(dst + 0, src + 0, 0)
memcpy(dst + 4, src + 4, 12)
memcpy(dst + 20, src + 20, 12)
memcpy(dst + 36, src + 36, 12)

With the fix, it is done correctly as:

memcpy(dst + 0, src + 0, 0)
memcpy(dst + 4, src + 4, 12)
memcpy(dst + 32, src + 32, 0)
memcpy(dst + 48, src + 48, 0)

Fixes: 4d7d7f69

 ("bpf: Adapt copy_map_value for multiple offset case")
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221114191547.1694267-4-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

In f71b2f64

 ("bpf: Refactor map->off_arr handling"), map->off_arr
was refactored to be btf_field_offs. The number of field offsets is
equal to maximum possible fields limited by BTF_FIELDS_MAX. Hence, reuse
BTF_FIELDS_MAX as spin_lock and timer no longer are to be handled
specially for offset sorting, fix the comment, and remove incorrect
WARN_ON as its rec->cnt can never exceed this value. The reason to keep
separate constant was the it was always more 2 more than total kptrs.
This is no longer the case.

Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221114191547.1694267-3-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

We don't want to commit to a specific name for these. Simply call them
allocated objects coming from bpf_obj_new, which is completely clear in
itself.

Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221114191547.1694267-2-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

Kang Minchul says:

====================
This patch series contains various checkpatch fixes
in btf.c, libbpf.c, ringbuf.c.

I know these are trivial but some issues are hard to ignore
and I think these checkpatch issues are accumulating.

v1 -> v2: changed cover letter message.
====================

Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>

Fixed some checkpatch issues in ringbuf.c

Signed-off-by: Kang Minchul <tegongkang@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221113190648.38556-4-tegongkang@gmail.com