Skip to content
  1. Aug 26, 2022
    • R Mohamed Shah's avatar
      ionic: VF initial random MAC address if no assigned mac · 19058be7
      R Mohamed Shah authored 
      

Assign a random mac address to the VF interface station
address if it boots with a zero mac address in order to match
similar behavior seen in other VF drivers.  Handle the errors
where the older firmware does not allow the VF to set its own
station address.

Newer firmware will allow the VF to set the station mac address
if it hasn't already been set administratively through the PF.
Setting it will also be allowed if the VF has trust.

Fixes: fbb39807 ("ionic: support sr-iov operations")
Signed-off-by: default avatarR Mohamed Shah <mohamed@pensando.io>
Signed-off-by: default avatarShannon Nelson <snelson@pensando.io>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
      19058be7
    • Shannon Nelson's avatar
      ionic: fix up issues with handling EAGAIN on FW cmds · 0fc4dd45
      Shannon Nelson authored 
      

In looping on FW update tests we occasionally see the
FW_ACTIVATE_STATUS command fail while it is in its EAGAIN loop
waiting for the FW activate step to finsh inside the FW.  The
firmware is complaining that the done bit is set when a new
dev_cmd is going to be processed.

Doing a clean on the cmd registers and doorbell before exiting
the wait-for-done and cleaning the done bit before the sleep
prevents this from occurring.

Fixes: fbfb8031 ("ionic: Add hardware init and device commands")
Signed-off-by: default avatarShannon Nelson <snelson@pensando.io>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
      0fc4dd45
    • Shannon Nelson's avatar
      ionic: clear broken state on generation change · 9cb9dadb
      Shannon Nelson authored 
      

There is a case found in heavy testing where a link flap happens just
before a firmware Recovery event and the driver gets stuck in the
BROKEN state.  This comes from the driver getting interrupted by a FW
generation change when coming back up from the link flap, and the call
to ionic_start_queues() in ionic_link_status_check() fails.  This can be
addressed by having the fw_up code clear the BROKEN bit if seen, rather
than waiting for a user to manually force the interface down and then
back up.

Fixes: 9e8eaf84 ("ionic: stop watchdog when in broken state")
Signed-off-by: default avatarShannon Nelson <snelson@pensando.io>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
      9cb9dadb
    • David Howells's avatar
      rxrpc: Fix locking in rxrpc's sendmsg · b0f571ec
      David Howells authored 
      

Fix three bugs in the rxrpc's sendmsg implementation:

 (1) rxrpc_new_client_call() should release the socket lock when returning
     an error from rxrpc_get_call_slot().

 (2) rxrpc_wait_for_tx_window_intr() will return without the call mutex
     held in the event that we're interrupted by a signal whilst waiting
     for tx space on the socket or relocking the call mutex afterwards.

     Fix this by: (a) moving the unlock/lock of the call mutex up to
     rxrpc_send_data() such that the lock is not held around all of
     rxrpc_wait_for_tx_window*() and (b) indicating to higher callers
     whether we're return with the lock dropped.  Note that this means
     recvmsg() will not block on this call whilst we're waiting.

 (3) After dropping and regaining the call mutex, rxrpc_send_data() needs
     to go and recheck the state of the tx_pending buffer and the
     tx_total_len check in case we raced with another sendmsg() on the same
     call.

Thinking on this some more, it might make sense to have different locks for
sendmsg() and recvmsg().  There's probably no need to make recvmsg() wait
for sendmsg().  It does mean that recvmsg() can return MSG_EOR indicating
that a call is dead before a sendmsg() to that call returns - but that can
currently happen anyway.

Without fix (2), something like the following can be induced:

	WARNING: bad unlock balance detected!
	5.16.0-rc6-syzkaller #0 Not tainted
	-------------------------------------
	syz-executor011/3597 is trying to release lock (&call->user_mutex) at:
	[<ffffffff885163a3>] rxrpc_do_sendmsg+0xc13/0x1350 net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c:748
	but there are no more locks to release!

	other info that might help us debug this:
	no locks held by syz-executor011/3597.
	...
	Call Trace:
	 <TASK>
	 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
	 dump_stack_lvl+0xcd/0x134 lib/dump_stack.c:106
	 print_unlock_imbalance_bug include/trace/events/lock.h:58 [inline]
	 __lock_release kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5306 [inline]
	 lock_release.cold+0x49/0x4e kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5657
	 __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x99/0x5e0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:900
	 rxrpc_do_sendmsg+0xc13/0x1350 net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c:748
	 rxrpc_sendmsg+0x420/0x630 net/rxrpc/af_rxrpc.c:561
	 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:704 [inline]
	 sock_sendmsg+0xcf/0x120 net/socket.c:724
	 ____sys_sendmsg+0x6e8/0x810 net/socket.c:2409
	 ___sys_sendmsg+0xf3/0x170 net/socket.c:2463
	 __sys_sendmsg+0xe5/0x1b0 net/socket.c:2492
	 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
	 do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
	 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

[Thanks to Hawkins Jiawei and Khalid Masum for their attempts to fix this]

Fixes: bc5e3a54 ("rxrpc: Use MSG_WAITALL to tell sendmsg() to temporarily ignore signals")
Reported-by: default avatar <syzbot+7f0483225d0c94cb3441@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarMarc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
Tested-by: default avatar <syzbot+7f0483225d0c94cb3441@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
cc: Hawkins Jiawei <yin31149@gmail.com>
cc: Khalid Masum <khalid.masum.92@gmail.com>
cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/166135894583.600315.7170979436768124075.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk


Signed-off-by: default avatarJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
      b0f571ec
  3. Aug 25, 2022
  5. Aug 24, 2022