bpf: Unify data extension operation of jited_ksyms and jited_linfo
We found that 32-bit environment can not print BPF line info due to a data inconsistency between jited_ksyms[0] and jited_linfo[0]. For example: jited_kyms[0] = 0xb800067c, jited_linfo[0] = 0xffffffffb800067c We know that both of them store BPF func address, but due to the different data extension operations when extended to u64, they may not be the same. We need to unify the data extension operations of them. Signed-off-by:Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com> Signed-off-by:
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by:
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAEf4BzZ-eDcdJZgJ+Np7Y=V-TVjDDvOMqPwzKjyWrh=i5juv4w@mail.gmail.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220530092815.1112406-2-pulehui@huawei.com
parent
21f1481a
Please register or sign in to comment