Skip to content
  1. Dec 19, 2017
  2. Dec 18, 2017
    • David S. Miller's avatar
      Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next · 59436c9e
      David S. Miller authored
      
      
      Daniel Borkmann says:
      
      ====================
      pull-request: bpf-next 2017-12-18
      
      The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your *net-next* tree.
      
      The main changes are:
      
      1) Allow arbitrary function calls from one BPF function to another BPF function.
         As of today when writing BPF programs, __always_inline had to be used in
         the BPF C programs for all functions, unnecessarily causing LLVM to inflate
         code size. Handle this more naturally with support for BPF to BPF calls
         such that this __always_inline restriction can be overcome. As a result,
         it allows for better optimized code and finally enables to introduce core
         BPF libraries in the future that can be reused out of different projects.
         x86 and arm64 JIT support was added as well, from Alexei.
      
      2) Add infrastructure for tagging functions as error injectable and allow for
         BPF to return arbitrary error values when BPF is attached via kprobes on
         those. This way of injecting errors generically eases testing and debugging
         without having to recompile or restart the kernel. Tags for opting-in for
         this facility are added with BPF_ALLOW_ERROR_INJECTION(), from Josef.
      
      3) For BPF offload via nfp JIT, add support for bpf_xdp_adjust_head() helper
         call for XDP programs. First part of this work adds handling of BPF
         capabilities included in the firmware, and the later patches add support
         to the nfp verifier part and JIT as well as some small optimizations,
         from Jakub.
      
      4) The bpftool now also gets support for basic cgroup BPF operations such
         as attaching, detaching and listing current BPF programs. As a requirement
         for the attach part, bpftool can now also load object files through
         'bpftool prog load'. This reuses libbpf which we have in the kernel tree
         as well. bpftool-cgroup man page is added along with it, from Roman.
      
      5) Back then commit e87c6bc3 ("bpf: permit multiple bpf attachments for
         a single perf event") added support for attaching multiple BPF programs
         to a single perf event. Given they are configured through perf's ioctl()
         interface, the interface has been extended with a PERF_EVENT_IOC_QUERY_BPF
         command in this work in order to return an array of one or multiple BPF
         prog ids that are currently attached, from Yonghong.
      
      6) Various minor fixes and cleanups to the bpftool's Makefile as well
         as a new 'uninstall' and 'doc-uninstall' target for removing bpftool
         itself or prior installed documentation related to it, from Quentin.
      
      7) Add CONFIG_CGROUP_BPF=y to the BPF kernel selftest config file which is
         required for the test_dev_cgroup test case to run, from Naresh.
      
      8) Fix reporting of XDP prog_flags for nfp driver, from Jakub.
      
      9) Fix libbpf's exit code from the Makefile when libelf was not found in
         the system, also from Jakub.
      ====================
      
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      59436c9e
    • Josef Bacik's avatar
      trace: reenable preemption if we modify the ip · 46df3d20
      Josef Bacik authored
      
      
      Things got moved around between the original bpf_override_return patches
      and the final version, and now the ftrace kprobe dispatcher assumes if
      you modified the ip that you also enabled preemption.  Make a comment of
      this and enable preemption, this fixes the lockdep splat that happened
      when using this feature.
      
      Fixes: 9802d865 ("bpf: add a bpf_override_function helper")
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      46df3d20
    • Jakub Kicinski's avatar
      nfp: set flags in the correct member of netdev_bpf · 4a29c0db
      Jakub Kicinski authored
      
      
      netdev_bpf.flags is the input member for installing the program.
      netdev_bpf.prog_flags is the output member for querying.  Set
      the correct one on query.
      
      Fixes: 92f0292b ("net: xdp: report flags program was installed with on query")
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarQuentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      4a29c0db
    • Jakub Kicinski's avatar
      libbpf: fix Makefile exit code if libelf not found · 21567ede
      Jakub Kicinski authored
      
      
      /bin/sh's exit does not recognize -1 as a number, leading to
      the following error message:
      
      /bin/sh: 1: exit: Illegal number: -1
      
      Use 1 as the exit code.
      
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarQuentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      21567ede
    • Daniel Borkmann's avatar
      Merge branch 'bpf-to-bpf-function-calls' · ef9fde06
      Daniel Borkmann authored
      Alexei Starovoitov says:
      
      ====================
      First of all huge thank you to Daniel, John, Jakub, Edward and others who
      reviewed multiple iterations of this patch set over the last many months
      and to Dave and others who gave critical feedback during netconf/netdev.
      
      The patch is solid enough and we thought through numerous corner cases,
      but it's not the end. More followups with code reorg and features to follow.
      
      TLDR: Allow arbitrary function calls from bpf function to another bpf function.
      
      Since the beginning of bpf all bpf programs were represented as a single function
      and program authors were forced to use always_inline for all functions
      in their C code. That was causing llvm to unnecessary inflate the code size
      and forcing developers to move code to header files with little code reuse.
      
      With a bit of additional complexity teach verifier to recognize
      arbitrary function calls from one bpf function to another as long as
      all of functions are presented to the verifier as a single bpf program.
      Extended program layout:
      ..
      r1 = ..    // arg1
      r2 = ..    // arg2
      call pc+1  // function call pc-relative
      exit
      .. = r1    // access arg1
      .. = r2    // access arg2
      ..
      call pc+20 // second level of function call
      ...
      
      It allows for better optimized code and finally allows to introduce
      the core bpf libraries that can be reused in different projects,
      since programs are no longer limited by single elf file.
      With function calls bpf can be compiled into multiple .o files.
      
      This patch is the first step. It detects programs that contain
      multiple functions and checks that calls between them are valid.
      It splits the sequence of bpf instructions (one program) into a set
      of bpf functions that call each other. Calls to only known
      functions are allowed. Since all functions are presented to
      the verifier at once conceptually it is 'static linking'.
      
      Future plans:
      - introduce BPF_PROG_TYPE_LIBRARY and allow a set of bpf functions
        to be loaded into the kernel that can be later linked to other
        programs with concrete program types. Aka 'dynamic linking'.
      
      - introduce function pointer type and indirect calls to allow
        bpf functions call other dynamically loaded bpf functions while
        the caller bpf function is already executing. Aka 'runtime linking'.
        This will be more generic and more flexible alternative
        to bpf_tail_calls.
      
      FAQ:
      Q: Interpreter and JIT changes mean that new instruction is introduced ?
      A: No. The call instruction technically stays the same. Now it can call
         both kernel helpers and other bpf functions.
         Calling convention stays the same as well.
         From uapi point of view the call insn got new 'relocation' BPF_PSEUDO_CALL
         similar to BPF_PSEUDO_MAP_FD 'relocation' of bpf_ldimm64 insn.
      
      Q: What had to change on LLVM side?
      A: Trivial LLVM patch to allow calls was applied to upcoming 6.0 release:
         https://reviews.llvm.org/rL318614
      
      
         with few bugfixes as well.
         Make sure to build the latest llvm to have bpf_call support.
      
      More details in the patches.
      ====================
      
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      ef9fde06