Skip to content
Commit 2722efb9 authored by Matt Roper's avatar Matt Roper Committed by Maarten Lankhorst
Browse files

drm/i915/gen9: Only copy WM results for changed pipes to skl_hw

When we write watermark values to the hardware, those values are stored
in dev_priv->wm.skl_hw.  However with recent watermark changes, the
results structure we're copying from only contains valid watermark and
DDB values for the pipes that are actually changing; the values for
other pipes remain 0.  Thus a blind copy of the entire skl_wm_values
structure will clobber the values for unchanged pipes...we need to be
more selective and only copy over the values for the changing pipes.

This mistake was hidden until recently due to another bug that caused us
to erroneously re-calculate watermarks for all active pipes rather than
changing pipes.  Only when that bug was fixed was the impact of this bug
discovered (e.g., modesets failing with "Requested display configuration
exceeds system watermark limitations" messages and leaving watermarks
non-functional, even ones initiated by intel_fbdev_restore_mode).

Changes since v1:
 - Add a function for copying a pipe's wm values
   (skl_copy_wm_for_pipe()) so we can reuse this later

Fixes: 734fa01f ("drm/i915/gen9: Calculate watermarks during atomic 'check' (v2)")
Fixes: 9b613022

 ("drm/i915/gen9: Re-allocate DDB only for changed pipes")
Signed-off-by: default avatarMatt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLyude <cpaul@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarMatt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Cc: Radhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1471463761-26796-4-git-send-email-cpaul@redhat.com
parent 656d1b89
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment