Skip to content
  1. Apr 15, 2018
  2. Apr 13, 2018
  3. Apr 12, 2018
    • Jani Nikula's avatar
    • Jani Nikula's avatar
      drm/i915/bios: filter out invalid DDC pins from VBT child devices · f212bf9a
      Jani Nikula authored
      
      
      The VBT contains the DDC pin to use for specific ports. Alas, sometimes
      the field appears to contain bogus data, and while we check for it later
      on in intel_gmbus_get_adapter() we fail to check the returned NULL on
      errors. Oops results.
      
      The simplest approach seems to be to catch and ignore the bogus DDC pins
      already at the VBT parsing phase, reverting to fixed per port default
      pins. This doesn't guarantee display working, but at least it prevents
      the oops. And we continue to be fuzzed by VBT.
      
      One affected machine is Dell Latitude 5590 where a BIOS upgrade added
      invalid DDC pins.
      
      Typical backtrace:
      
      [   35.461411] WARN_ON(!intel_gmbus_is_valid_pin(dev_priv, pin))
      [   35.461432] WARNING: CPU: 6 PID: 411 at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_i2c.c:844 intel_gmbus_get_adapter+0x32/0x37 [i915]
      [   35.461437] Modules linked in: i915 ahci libahci dm_snapshot dm_bufio dm_raid raid456 async_raid6_recov async_pq raid6_pq async_xor xor async_memcpy async_tx
      [   35.461445] CPU: 6 PID: 411 Comm: kworker/u16:2 Not tainted 4.16.0-rc7.x64-g1cda370ffded #1
      [   35.461447] Hardware name: Dell Inc. Latitude 5590/0MM81M, BIOS 1.1.9 03/13/2018
      [   35.461450] Workqueue: events_unbound async_run_entry_fn
      [   35.461465] RIP: 0010:intel_gmbus_get_adapter+0x32/0x37 [i915]
      [   35.461467] RSP: 0018:ffff9b4e43d47c40 EFLAGS: 00010286
      [   35.461469] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff98f90639f800 RCX: ffffffffae051960
      [   35.461471] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000092 RDI: 0000000000000246
      [   35.461472] RBP: ffff98f905410000 R08: 0000004d062a83f6 R09: 00000000000003bd
      [   35.461474] R10: 0000000000000031 R11: ffffffffad4eda58 R12: ffff98f905410000
      [   35.461475] R13: ffff98f9064c1000 R14: ffff9b4e43d47cf0 R15: ffff98f905410000
      [   35.461477] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff98f92e580000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
      [   35.461479] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
      [   35.461481] CR2: 00007f5682359008 CR3: 00000001b700c005 CR4: 00000000003606e0
      [   35.461483] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
      [   35.461484] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
      [   35.461486] Call Trace:
      [   35.461501]  intel_hdmi_set_edid+0x37/0x27f [i915]
      [   35.461515]  intel_hdmi_detect+0x7c/0x97 [i915]
      [   35.461518]  drm_helper_probe_single_connector_modes+0xe1/0x6c0
      [   35.461521]  drm_setup_crtcs+0x129/0xa6a
      [   35.461523]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x34/0x70
      [   35.461525]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x34/0x70
      [   35.461527]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x40/0x70
      [   35.461528]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x34/0x70
      [   35.461529]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x40/0x70
      [   35.461531]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x34/0x70
      [   35.461532]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x40/0x70
      [   35.461534]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x34/0x70
      [   35.461536]  __drm_fb_helper_initial_config_and_unlock+0x34/0x46f
      [   35.461538]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x40/0x70
      [   35.461541]  ? _cond_resched+0x10/0x33
      [   35.461557]  intel_fbdev_initial_config+0xf/0x1c [i915]
      [   35.461560]  async_run_entry_fn+0x2e/0xf5
      [   35.461563]  process_one_work+0x15b/0x364
      [   35.461565]  worker_thread+0x2c/0x3a0
      [   35.461567]  ? process_one_work+0x364/0x364
      [   35.461568]  kthread+0x10c/0x122
      [   35.461570]  ? _kthread_create_on_node+0x5d/0x5d
      [   35.461572]  ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
      [   35.461574] Code: 74 16 89 f6 48 8d 04 b6 48 c1 e0 05 48 29 f0 48 8d 84 c7 e8 11 00 00 c3 48 c7 c6 b0 19 1e c0 48 c7 c7 64 8a 1c c0 e8 47 88 ed ec <0f> 0b 31 c0 c3 8b 87 a4 04 00 00 80 e4 fc 09 c6 89 b7 a4 04 00
      [   35.461604] WARNING: CPU: 6 PID: 411 at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_i2c.c:844 intel_gmbus_get_adapter+0x32/0x37 [i915]
      [   35.461606] ---[ end trace 4fe1e63e2dd93373 ]---
      [   35.461609] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000010
      [   35.461613] IP: i2c_transfer+0x4/0x86
      [   35.461614] PGD 0 P4D 0
      [   35.461616] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
      [   35.461618] Modules linked in: i915 ahci libahci dm_snapshot dm_bufio dm_raid raid456 async_raid6_recov async_pq raid6_pq async_xor xor async_memcpy async_tx
      [   35.461624] CPU: 6 PID: 411 Comm: kworker/u16:2 Tainted: G        W        4.16.0-rc7.x64-g1cda370ffded #1
      [   35.461625] Hardware name: Dell Inc. Latitude 5590/0MM81M, BIOS 1.1.9 03/13/2018
      [   35.461628] Workqueue: events_unbound async_run_entry_fn
      [   35.461630] RIP: 0010:i2c_transfer+0x4/0x86
      [   35.461631] RSP: 0018:ffff9b4e43d47b30 EFLAGS: 00010246
      [   35.461633] RAX: ffff9b4e43d47b6e RBX: 0000000000000005 RCX: 0000000000000001
      [   35.461635] RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: ffff9b4e43d47b80 RDI: 0000000000000000
      [   35.461636] RBP: ffff9b4e43d47bd8 R08: 0000004d062a83f6 R09: 00000000000003bd
      [   35.461638] R10: 0000000000000031 R11: ffffffffad4eda58 R12: 0000000000000002
      [   35.461639] R13: 0000000000000001 R14: ffff9b4e43d47b6f R15: ffff9b4e43d47c07
      [   35.461641] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff98f92e580000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
      [   35.461643] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
      [   35.461645] CR2: 0000000000000010 CR3: 00000001b700c005 CR4: 00000000003606e0
      [   35.461646] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
      [   35.461647] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
      [   35.461649] Call Trace:
      [   35.461652]  drm_do_probe_ddc_edid+0xb3/0x128
      [   35.461654]  drm_get_edid+0xe5/0x38d
      [   35.461669]  intel_hdmi_set_edid+0x45/0x27f [i915]
      [   35.461684]  intel_hdmi_detect+0x7c/0x97 [i915]
      [   35.461687]  drm_helper_probe_single_connector_modes+0xe1/0x6c0
      [   35.461689]  drm_setup_crtcs+0x129/0xa6a
      [   35.461691]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x34/0x70
      [   35.461693]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x34/0x70
      [   35.461694]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x40/0x70
      [   35.461696]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x34/0x70
      [   35.461697]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x40/0x70
      [   35.461698]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x34/0x70
      [   35.461700]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x40/0x70
      [   35.461701]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x34/0x70
      [   35.461703]  __drm_fb_helper_initial_config_and_unlock+0x34/0x46f
      [   35.461705]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x40/0x70
      [   35.461707]  ? _cond_resched+0x10/0x33
      [   35.461724]  intel_fbdev_initial_config+0xf/0x1c [i915]
      [   35.461727]  async_run_entry_fn+0x2e/0xf5
      [   35.461729]  process_one_work+0x15b/0x364
      [   35.461731]  worker_thread+0x2c/0x3a0
      [   35.461733]  ? process_one_work+0x364/0x364
      [   35.461734]  kthread+0x10c/0x122
      [   35.461736]  ? _kthread_create_on_node+0x5d/0x5d
      [   35.461738]  ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
      [   35.461739] Code: 5c fa e1 ad 48 89 df e8 ea fb ff ff e9 2a ff ff ff 0f 1f 44 00 00 31 c0 e9 43 fd ff ff 31 c0 45 31 e4 e9 c5 fd ff ff 41 54 55 53 <48> 8b 47 10 48 83 78 10 00 74 70 41 89 d4 48 89 f5 48 89 fb 65
      [   35.461756] RIP: i2c_transfer+0x4/0x86 RSP: ffff9b4e43d47b30
      [   35.461757] CR2: 0000000000000010
      [   35.461759] ---[ end trace 4fe1e63e2dd93374 ]---
      
      Based on a patch by Fei Li.
      
      v2: s/reverting/sticking/ (Chris)
      
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
      Cc: Fei Li <fei.li@intel.com>
      Co-developed-by: default avatarFei Li <fei.li@intel.com>
      Reported-by: default avatarPavel Nakonechnyi <zorg1331@gmail.com>
      Reported-and-tested-by: default avatarSeweryn Kokot <sewkokot@gmail.com>
      Reported-and-tested-by: default avatarLaszlo Valko <valko@linux.karinthy.hu>
      Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105549
      Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105961
      
      
      Reviewed-by: default avatarChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
      Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180411131519.9091-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
      f212bf9a
    • Oscar Mateo's avatar
      drm/i915: Split out functions for different kinds of workarounds · 59b449d5
      Oscar Mateo authored
      
      
      There are different kind of workarounds (those that modify registers that
      live in the context image, those that modify global registers, those that
      whitelist registers, etc...) and they have different requirements in terms
      of where they are applied and how. Also, by splitting them apart, it should
      be easier to decide where a new workaround should go.
      
      v2:
        - Add multiple MISSING_CASE
        - Rebased
      
      v3:
        - Rename mmio_workarounds to gt_workarounds (Chris, Mika)
        - Create empty placeholders for BDW and CHV GT WAs
        - Rebased
      
      v4: Rebased
      
      v5:
       - Rebased
       - FORCE_TO_NONPRIV register exists since BDW, so make a path
         for it to achieve universality, even if empty (Chris)
      
      Signed-off-by: default avatarOscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
      Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      [ickle: appease checkpatch]
      Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1523376767-18480-2-git-send-email-oscar.mateo@intel.com
      59b449d5
    • Oscar Mateo's avatar
      drm/i915: Move a bunch of workaround-related code to its own file · 7d3c425f
      Oscar Mateo authored
      
      
      This has grown to be a sizable amount of code, so move it to
      its own file before we try to refactor anything. For the moment,
      we are leaving behind the WA BB code and the WAs that get applied
      (incorrectly) in init_clock_gating, but we will deal with it later.
      
      v2: Use intel_ prefix for code that deals with the hardware (Chris)
      v3: Rebased
      v4:
        - Rebased
        - New license header
      v5:
        - Rebased
        - Added some organisational notes to the file (Chris)
      v6: Include DOC section in the documentation build (Jani)
      
      Signed-off-by: default avatarOscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
      Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      [ickle: appease checkpatch, mostly]
      Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1523376767-18480-1-git-send-email-oscar.mateo@intel.com
      7d3c425f
    • Chris Wilson's avatar
      drm/i915/execlists: Set queue priority from secondary port · 15c83c43
      Chris Wilson authored
      We can refine our current execlists->queue_priority if we inspect
      ELSP[1] rather than the head of the unsubmitted queue. Currently, we use
      the unsubmitted queue and say that if a subsequent request is more
      important than the current queue, we will rerun the submission tasklet
      to evaluate the need for preemption. However, we only want to preempt if
      we need to jump ahead of a currently executing request in ELSP. The
      second reason for running the submission tasklet is amalgamate requests
      into the active context on ELSP[0] to avoid a stall when ELSP[0] drains.
      (Though repeatedly amalgamating requests into the active context and
      triggering many lite-restore is off question gain, the goal really is to
      put a context into ELSP[1] to cover the interrupt.) So if instead of
      looking at the head of the queue, we look at the context in ELSP[1] we
      can answer both of the questions more accurately -- we don't need to
      rerun the submission tasklet unless our new request is important enough
      to feed into, at least, ELSP[1].
      
      v2: Add some comments from the discussion with Tvrtko.
      v3: More commentary to cross-reference queue_request()
      
      References: f6322edd
      
       ("drm/i915/preemption: Allow preemption between submission ports")
      Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
      Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
      Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
      Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180411103929.27374-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      15c83c43
  4. Apr 11, 2018
  5. Apr 10, 2018
  6. Apr 09, 2018
  7. Apr 08, 2018
    • Lyude Paul's avatar
      drm/i915/dp: Send DPCD ON for MST before phy_up · be1c63c8
      Lyude Paul authored
      
      
      When doing a modeset where the sink is transitioning from D3 to D0 , it
      would sometimes be possible for the initial power_up_phy() to start
      timing out. This would only be observed in the last action before the
      sink went into D3 mode was intel_dp_sink_dpms(DRM_MODE_DPMS_OFF). We
      originally thought this might be an issue with us accidentally shutting
      off the aux block when putting the sink into D3, but since the DP spec
      mandates that sinks must wake up within 1ms while we have 100ms to
      respond to an ESI irq, this didn't really add up. Turns out that the
      problem is more subtle then that:
      
      It turns out that the timeout is from us not enabling DPMS on the MST
      hub before actually trying to initiate sideband communications. This
      would cause the first sideband communication (power_up_phy()), to start
      timing out because the sink wasn't ready to respond. Afterwards, we
      would call intel_dp_sink_dpms(DRM_MODE_DPMS_ON) in
      intel_ddi_pre_enable_dp(), which would actually result in waking up the
      sink so that sideband requests would work again.
      
      Since DPMS is what lets us actually bring the hub up into a state where
      sideband communications become functional again, we just need to make
      sure to enable DPMS on the display before attempting to perform sideband
      communications.
      
      Changes since v1:
      - Remove comment above if (!intel_dp->is_mst) - vsryjala
      - Move intel_dp_sink_dpms() for MST into intel_dp_post_disable_mst() to
        keep enable/disable paths symmetrical
      - Improve commit message - dhnkrn
      Changes since v2:
      - Only send DPMS off when we're disabling the last sink, and only send
        DPMS on when we're enabling the first sink - dhnkrn
      Changes since v3:
      - Check against is_mst, not intel_dp->is_mst - dhnkrn/vsyrjala
      
      Signed-off-by: default avatarLyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarDhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
      Tested-by: default avatarLaura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
      Fixes: ad260ab3 ("drm/i915/dp: Write to SET_POWER dpcd to enable MST hub.")
      Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180407011053.22437-1-lyude@redhat.com
      be1c63c8
  8. Apr 07, 2018