Skip to content
Commit d108c772 authored by Andrey Ryabinin's avatar Andrey Ryabinin Committed by Linus Torvalds
Browse files

mm/vmscan: don't change pgdat state on base of a single LRU list state



We have separate LRU list for each memory cgroup.  Memory reclaim
iterates over cgroups and calls shrink_inactive_list() every inactive
LRU list.  Based on the state of a single LRU shrink_inactive_list() may
flag the whole node as dirty,congested or under writeback.  This is
obviously wrong and hurtful.  It's especially hurtful when we have
possibly small congested cgroup in system.  Than *all* direct reclaims
waste time by sleeping in wait_iff_congested().  And the more memcgs in
the system we have the longer memory allocation stall is, because
wait_iff_congested() called on each lru-list scan.

Sum reclaim stats across all visited LRUs on node and flag node as
dirty, congested or under writeback based on that sum.  Also call
congestion_wait(), wait_iff_congested() once per pgdat scan, instead of
once per lru-list scan.

This only fixes the problem for global reclaim case.  Per-cgroup reclaim
may alter global pgdat flags too, which is wrong.  But that is separate
issue and will be addressed in the next patch.

This change will not have any effect on a systems with all workload
concentrated in a single cgroup.

[aryabinin@virtuozzo.com: check nr_writeback against all nr_taken, not just file]
  Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180406180254.8970-1-aryabinin@virtuozzo.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180323152029.11084-4-aryabinin@virtuozzo.com
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarShakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
parent c4fd4fa5
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment