Skip to content
Commit b6debf15 authored by Qu Wenruo's avatar Qu Wenruo Committed by David Sterba
Browse files

btrfs: qgroup: Search commit root for rescan to avoid missing extent



When doing qgroup rescan using the following script (modified from
btrfs/017 test case), we can sometimes hit qgroup corruption.

------
umount $dev &> /dev/null
umount $mnt &> /dev/null

mkfs.btrfs -f -n 64k $dev
mount $dev $mnt

extent_size=8192

xfs_io -f -d -c "pwrite 0 $extent_size" $mnt/foo > /dev/null
btrfs subvolume snapshot $mnt $mnt/snap

xfs_io -f -c "reflink $mnt/foo" $mnt/foo-reflink > /dev/null
xfs_io -f -c "reflink $mnt/foo" $mnt/snap/foo-reflink > /dev/null
xfs_io -f -c "reflink $mnt/foo" $mnt/snap/foo-reflink2 > /dev/unll
btrfs quota enable $mnt

 # -W is the new option to only wait rescan while not starting new one
btrfs quota rescan -W $mnt
btrfs qgroup show -prce $mnt
umount $mnt

 # Need to patch btrfs-progs to report qgroup mismatch as error
btrfs check $dev || _fail
------

For fast machine, we can hit some corruption which missed accounting
tree blocks:
------
qgroupid         rfer         excl     max_rfer     max_excl parent  child
--------         ----         ----     --------     -------- ------  -----
0/5           8.00KiB        0.00B         none         none ---     ---
0/257         8.00KiB        0.00B         none         none ---     ---
------

This is due to the fact that we're always searching commit root for
btrfs_find_all_roots() at qgroup_rescan_leaf(), but the leaf we get is
from current transaction, not commit root.

And if our tree blocks get modified in current transaction, we won't
find any owner in commit root, thus causing the corruption.

Fix it by searching commit root for extent tree for
qgroup_rescan_leaf().

Reported-by: default avatarNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
parent 7a1b1e70
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment