[S390] user per registers vs. ptrace single stepping
git commit 5e9a2692 "[S390] ptrace cleanup" introduced a regression for the case when both a user PER set (e.g. a storage alteration trace) and PTRACE_SINGLESTEP are active. The new code will overrule the user PER set with a instruction-fetch PER set over the whole address space for ptrace single stepping. The inferior process will be stopped after each instruction with an instruction fetch event. Any other events that may have occurred concurrently are not reported (e.g. storage alteration event) because the control bits for them are not set. The solution is to merge the PER control bits of the user PER set with the PER_EVENT_IFETCH control bit for PTRACE_SINGLESTEP. Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by:Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
parent
caa04f69
Please register or sign in to comment