cpufreq: Fix misplaced call to cpufreq_update_policy()
The call to cpufreq_update_policy() is placed in the CPU hotplug callback of cpufreq_stats, which has a higher priority than the CPU hotplug callback of cpufreq-core. As a result, during CPU_ONLINE/CPU_ONLINE_FROZEN, we end up calling cpufreq_update_policy() *before* calling cpufreq_add_dev() ! And for uninitialized CPUs, it just returns silently, not doing anything. To add to that, cpufreq_stats is not even the right place to call cpufreq_update_policy() to begin with. The cpufreq core ought to handle this in its own callback, from an elegance/relevance perspective. So move the invocation of cpufreq_update_policy() to cpufreq_cpu_callback, and place it *after* cpufreq_add_dev(). Signed-off-by:Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by:
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by:
Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
parent
c095ba72
Please register or sign in to comment