Skip to content
Commit 0d333ac7 authored by Daniele Ceraolo Spurio's avatar Daniele Ceraolo Spurio Committed by Chris Wilson
Browse files

drm/i915: fix SFC reset flow



Our assumption that the we can ask the HW to lock the SFC even if not
currently in use does not match the HW commitment. The expectation from
the HW is that SW will not try to lock the SFC if the engine is not
using it and if we do that the behavior is undefined; on ICL the HW
ends up to returning the ack and ignoring our lock request, but this is
not guaranteed and we shouldn't expect it going forward.

Also, failing to get the ack while the SFC is in use means that we can't
cleanly reset it, so fail the engine reset in that scenario.

v2: drop rmw change, keep the log as debug and handle failure (Chris),
    improve comments (Tvrtko).

Reported-by: default avatarOwen Zhang <owen.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: default avatarTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: default avatarChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190919015330.15435-1-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
parent 56c05de6
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment