Skip to content
Commit c75aa924 authored by Thomas Petazzoni's avatar Thomas Petazzoni Committed by Adhemerval Zanella
Browse files

microblaze: Add missing implementation when !__ASSUME_TIME64_SYSCALLS



In commit a92f4e62 ("linux: Add time64
pselect support"), a Microblaze specific implementation of
__pselect32() was added to cover the case of kernels < 3.15 which lack
the pselect6 system call.

This new file sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/microblaze/pselect32.c takes
precedence over the default implementation
sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/pselect32.c.

However sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/pselect32.c provides an implementation
of __pselect32() which is needed when __ASSUME_TIME64_SYSCALLS is not
defined. On Microblaze, which is a 32-bit architecture,
__ASSUME_TIME64_SYSCALLS is only true for kernels >= 5.1.

Due to sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/microblaze/pselect32.c taking
precedence over sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/pselect32.c, it means that
when we are with a kernel >= 3.15 but < 5.1, we need a __pselect32()
implementation, but sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/microblaze/pselect32.c
doesn't provide it, and sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/pselect32.c which
would provide it is not compiled in.

This causes the following build failure on Microblaze with for example
Linux kernel headers 4.9:

[...]/build/libc_pic.os: in function `__pselect64':
(.text+0x120b44): undefined reference to `__pselect32'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status

Signed-off-by: default avatarThomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarAdhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
parent 484e672d
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Please register or to comment