cdefs.h: Add clang fortify directives
For instance, the read wrapper is currently expanded as: extern __inline __attribute__((__always_inline__)) __attribute__((__artificial__)) __attribute__((__warn_unused_result__)) ssize_t read (int __fd, void *__buf, size_t __nbytes) { return __glibc_safe_or_unknown_len (__nbytes, sizeof (char), __glibc_objsize0 (__buf)) ? __read_alias (__fd, __buf, __nbytes) : __glibc_unsafe_len (__nbytes, sizeof (char), __glibc_objsize0 (__buf)) ? __read_chk_warn (__fd, __buf, __nbytes, __builtin_object_size (__buf, 0)) : __read_chk (__fd, __buf, __nbytes, __builtin_object_size (__buf, 0)); } The wrapper relies on __builtin_object_size call lowers to a constant at compile-time and many other operations in the wrapper depends on having a single, known value for parameters. Because this is impossible to have for function parameters, the wrapper depends heavily on inlining to work and While this is an entirely viable approach on GCC, it is not fully reliable on clang. This is because by the time llvm gets to inlining and optimizing, there is a minimal reliable source and type-level information available (more information on a more deep explanation on how to fortify wrapper works on clang [1]). To allow the wrapper to work reliably and with the same functionality as with GCC, clang requires a different approach: * __attribute__((diagnose_if(c, “str”, “warning”))) which is a function level attribute; if the compiler can determine that 'c' is true at compile-time, it will emit a warning with the text 'str1'. If it would be better to emit an error, the wrapper can use "error" instead of "warning". * __attribute__((overloadable)) which is also a function-level attribute; and it allows C++-style overloading to occur on C functions. * __attribute__((pass_object_size(n))) which is a parameter-level attribute; and it makes the compiler evaluate __builtin_object_size(param, n) at each call site of the function that has the parameter, and passes it in as a hidden parameter. This attribute has two side-effects that are key to how FORTIFY works: 1. It can overload solely on pass_object_size (e.g. there are two overloads of foo in void foo(char * __attribute__((pass_object_size(0))) c); void foo(char *); (The one with pass_object_size attribute has precende over the default one). 2. A function with at least one pass_object_size parameter can never have its address taken (and overload resolution respects this). Thus the read wrapper can be implemented as follows, without hindering any fortify coverage compile and runtime: extern __inline __attribute__((__always_inline__)) __attribute__((__artificial__)) __attribute__((__overloadable__)) __attribute__((__warn_unused_result__)) ssize_t read (int __fd, void *const __attribute__((pass_object_size (0))) __buf, size_t __nbytes) __attribute__((__diagnose_if__ ((((__builtin_object_size (__buf, 0)) != -1ULL && (__nbytes) > (__builtin_object_size (__buf, 0)) / (1))), "read called with bigger length than size of the destination buffer", "warning"))) { return (__builtin_object_size (__buf, 0) == (size_t) -1) ? __read_alias (__fd, __buf, __nbytes) : __read_chk (__fd, __buf, __nbytes, __builtin_object_size (__buf, 0)); } To avoid changing the current semantic for GCC, a set of macros is defined to enable the clang required attributes, along with some changes on internal macros to avoid the need to issue the symbol_chk symbols (which are done through the __diagnose_if__ attribute for clang). The read wrapper is simplified as: __fortify_function __attribute_overloadable__ __wur ssize_t read (int __fd, __fortify_clang_overload_arg0 (void *, ,__buf), size_t __nbytes) __fortify_clang_warning_only_if_bos0_lt (__nbytes, __buf, "read called with bigger length than " "size of the destination buffer") { return __glibc_fortify (read, __nbytes, sizeof (char), __glibc_objsize0 (__buf), __fd, __buf, __nbytes); } There is no expected semantic or code change when using GCC. Also, clang does not support __va_arg_pack, so variadic functions are expanded to call va_arg implementations. The error function must not have bodies (address takes are expanded to nonfortified calls), and with the __fortify_function compiler might still create a body with the C++ mangling name (due to the overload attribute). In this case, the function is defined with __fortify_function_error_function macro instead. [1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DFfZDICTbL7RqS74wJVIJ-YnjQOj1SaoqfhbgddFYSM/edit Checked on aarch64, armhf, x86_64, and i686. Reviewed-by:Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com> Tested-by:
Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>
Loading
Please register or sign in to comment