According to BSpec there is now also a code 0x02,
which corresponds to QGV point being rejected,
this code so lets extend mask to check this.

Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210531064845.4389-1-stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com

The fast path only updates cursor register what will not cause
any updates in the screen when using PSR2 selective fetch.

The only option that we have is to go through the slow patch that will
do full atomic commit, that will trigger the PSR2 selective fetch
compute and programing calls.

Without this patch is possible to see a mouse movement lag in Gnome
when PSR2 selective fetch is enabled.

Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210717011227.204494-3-jose.souza@intel.com

Without this planes that were added by intel_psr2_sel_fetch_update()
that intersect with pipe damaged area will not
have skl_program_plane() and intel_psr2_program_plane_sel_fetch()
called, causing panel to not be properly updated.

Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210717011227.204494-2-jose.souza@intel.com

Commit 5a9d38b2 ("drm/i915/display: hide workaround for broken vbt
in intel_bios.c") moved the workaround for broken or missing VBT to
intel_bios.c. However is_port_valid() only protects the handling of
different skus of the same display version. Since in
intel_setup_outputs() we share the code path with version 9, this would
also create port F for SKL/KBL, which does not exist.

Missing VBT can be reproduced when starting a headless QEMU with no
opregion available.

Avoid the issue by splitting versions 9 and 10 in intel_setup_outputs(),
which also makes it more clear what code path it's taking for each
version.

v2: move generic display version after Geminilake since that one has
a different set of outputs

Fixes: 5a9d38b2

 ("drm/i915/display: hide workaround for broken vbt in intel_bios.c")
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Tested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210722232922.3796835-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com

We were using GRAPHICS_VER() to handle SKL_DFSM register, which means we
were not handling GLK correctly since that has GRAPHICS_VER == 9, but
DISPLAY_VER == 10. Switch the entire branch to check DISPLAY_VER
which makes it more in line with Bspec.

Even though the Bspec has an exception for RKL in
TGL_DFSM_PIPE_D_DISABLE, we don't have to do anything as the bit has
disable semantic and RKL doesn't have pipe D.

Bspec: 50075, 7548
Fixes: 2b5a4562

 ("drm/i915/display: Simplify GLK display version tests")
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210723234352.214459-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com

A new step has been added to the DP modeset sequences for all platforms
with display version 12 and beyond:  if enabling DP MST with FEC, we
need to set a chicken bit before enabling the transcoder.  The chicken
bit should be disabled again before disabling the transcoder (which we
can do unconditionally since it shouldn't be set anyway in non-MST
cases).

Bspec: 49190, 54128, 55424
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210723170618.1477415-1-matthew.d.roper@intel.com


Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>

PORT_A to PORT_F are regular integers defined in the enum port,
while for_each_port_masked requires a bit mask for the ports.

Current given mask: 0b111
Desired mask: 0b111111

I noticed this while Christoph was reporting a bug found on headless
GVT configuration which bisect blamed commit 3ae04c0c ("drm/i915/bios:
limit default outputs to ports A through F")

v2: Avoid unnecessary line continuations as pointed by CI and Christoph

Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Fixes: 3ae04c0c

 ("drm/i915/bios: limit default outputs to ports A through F")
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Tested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210723095225.562913-1-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com

PSR2 is not supported on DG2.

Cc: Caz Yokoyama <Caz.Yokoyama@intel.com>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210714031540.3539704-49-matthew.d.roper@intel.com

Although the bspec labels four of DG2's outputs as "combo PHY," the
underlying PHYs in both cases are actually Synopsys PHYs that are
programmed completely differently than the traditional Intel "combo" PHY
units.  As such, we don't want intel_phy_is_combo to take us down legacy
programming paths, so just return false from it on DG2.  Instead add a
new intel_phy_is_snps() that will return true for all DG2 PHYs.

Cc: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Cc: Matt Atwood <matthew.s.atwood@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Atwood <matthew.s.atwood@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210714031540.3539704-46-matthew.d.roper@intel.com

Add support to load latest DMC version.
The Release Notes mentions that this version fixes
timeout issues.

Cc: Madhumitha Pradeep <madhumitha.tolakanahalli.pradeep@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Madhumitha Pradeep <madhumitha.tolakanahalli.pradeep@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210721215238.24980-4-anusha.srivatsa@intel.com

Add support to the latest DMC firmware.

Cc: Madhunitha Pradeep <madhumitha.tolakanahalli.pradeep@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Madhumitha Pradeep <madhumitha.tolakanahalli.pradeep@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210721215238.24980-3-anusha.srivatsa@intel.com

Lets use RUNTIME_INFO->step since all platforms now have their
stepping info in intel_step.c. This makes intel_get_stepping_info()
a lot simpler.

Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210721215238.24980-2-anusha.srivatsa@intel.com

With the addition of stepping info for
all platforms, lets use macros for handling them
and autogenerating code for all steps at a time.

Suggested-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210721215238.24980-1-anusha.srivatsa@intel.com

DG2 doesn't have a SAGV or QGV points that determine memory bandwidth.
Instead it has a constant amount of memory bandwidth available to
display that does not need to be reduced based on the number of active
planes.

For simplicity, we'll just modify driver initialization to create a
single dummy QGV point with the proper amount of memory bandwidth,
rather than trying to query the pcode for this information.

Bspec: 64631
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210721223043.834562-19-matthew.d.roper@intel.com

DG2 does not use system DRAM information for BW_BUDDY programming or
watermark workarounds, so there's no need to read this out at startup.

Cc: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210721223043.834562-18-matthew.d.roper@intel.com

Although the BW_BUDDY registers still exist, they are not used for
anything on DG2.  This change is expected to hold true for future dgpu's
too.

Bspec: 49218
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210721223043.834562-17-matthew.d.roper@intel.com

DG2 extends our DDB to four DBuf slices; pipes A+B only have access to
the first two slices, whereas pipes C+D only have access to the second
two.

Confusingly, our bspec decided to switch from 1-based numbering
of dbuf slices (S1, S2) to 0-based numbering (S0, S1, S2, S3) in
Display13.  At the moment we're using the 0-based number scheme for the
DBUF_CTL_S() register addressing, but the 1-based number scheme in the
actual slice assignment tables.  We may want to consider switching the
assignment over to 0-based numbering too at some point...

Bspec: 49255
Bspec: 50057
Cc: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210721223043.834562-16-matthew.d.roper@intel.com

DG2 has outputs on DDI A-D attached to what the bspec diagram shows as
"Combo PHY A-D."  Note that despite being labelled "combo" the PHYs on
these outputs are Synopsys PHYs rather than traditional Intel combo PHY
technology.

Cc: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210721223043.834562-15-matthew.d.roper@intel.com

On DG2 we're supposed to just wait 600us after programming the well
before moving on; there won't be an ack from the hardware.

Bspec: 49296
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210721223043.834562-14-matthew.d.roper@intel.com

DG2 has no shared DPLL's or DDI clock muxing.  The Port PLL is embedded
within the PHY.

Bspec: 54032
Bspec: 54034
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210721223043.834562-13-matthew.d.roper@intel.com

Note that DG2 only has a single possible refclk frequency (38.4 MHz).

v2:
 - Drop two now-unused cdclk entries

Bspec: 54034
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210721223043.834562-12-matthew.d.roper@intel.com

As with DG1, DG2 has an ICL-style south display interface provided on
the same PCI device.  Add a fake PCH to ensure DG2 takes the appropriate
codepaths for south display handling.

Bspec: 54871, 50062, 49961, 53673
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Aditya Swarup <aditya.swarup@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210721223043.834562-11-matthew.d.roper@intel.com

The current interrupt handler is getting increasingly complicated and
Xe_HP changes will bring even more complexity.  Let's split off a new
interrupt handler starting with DG1 (i.e., when the master tile
interrupt register was added to the design) and use that as the basis
for the new Xe_HP changes.

Now that we track the hardware IP's release number as well as the
version number, we can also properly define DG1 has version "12.10" and
replace the has_master_unit_irq feature flag with an IP version test.

Bspec: 50875
Cc: Daniele Spurio Ceraolo <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Lis <tomasz.lis@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Atwood <matthew.s.atwood@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210721223043.834562-5-matthew.d.roper@intel.com

As we begin applying XeHP and DG2 patches, the basic platform
definitions and macros (like IS_DG2()) will be needed in both
drm-intel-next and drm-intel-gt-next.  Those initial definition patches
are applied to a topic branch and merged to both trees.

Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>

DG2 has Xe_LPD display (version 13) and Xe_HPG (version 12.55) graphics.
There are two variants (treated as subplatforms in the code):  DG2-G10
and DG2-G11 that require independent programming in some areas (e.g.,
workarounds).

Bspec: 44472, 44474, 46197, 48028, 48077
Cc: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210721223043.834562-4-matthew.d.roper@intel.com

XeHP SDV is a Intel® dGPU without display. This is just the definition
of some basic platform macros, by large a copy of current state of
Tigerlake which does not reflect the end state of this platform.

v2:
 - Switch to intel_step infrastructure for stepping matches. (Jani)
v3:
 - Bring earlier in patch series and leave addition of new media engines
   to the engine mask for a later patch.

Bspec: 44467, 48077
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210721223043.834562-3-matthew.d.roper@intel.com

Our _FEATURES macro went back to GEN7, extending each other, making it
difficult to grasp what was really enabled/disabled. Take the
opportunity of the GEN -> XE_HP name break and also break with the
feature inheritance.

For XE_HP this basically goes from GEN12 back to GEN7 coalescing the
features making sure the overrides remain, remove all the
display-specific features and sort it.

Then also remove the definitions that would be overridden by
DGFX_FEATURES and those that were 0 (since that is the default).
Exception here is has_master_unit_irq: although it is a feature that
started with DG1 and is true for all DGFX platforms, it's also true for
XE_HP in general.

Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210721223043.834562-2-matthew.d.roper@intel.com

Besides the arch version returned by GRAPHICS_VER(), new platforms
contain a "release id" to make clear the difference from one platform to
another.

The release id number is not formally defined by hardware until future
platforms that will expose it via a new GMD_ID register.  For the
platforms we support before that register becomes available we will set
the values in software and we can set them as we please. So the plan is
to set them so we can group different features under a single
GRAPHICS_VER_FULL() check.

After GMD_ID is used, the usefulness of a "full version check" will be
greatly reduced and will be mostly used for deciding workarounds and a
few code paths. So it makes sense to keep it as a separate field from
graphics_ver. Also, as a platform with `release == n` may be closer
feature-wise to `n - 2` than to `n - 1`, use the word "release" rather
than the more common "minor" for this

This is a mix of 2 independent changes: one by me and the other by Matt
Roper.

v2:
  - Reword commit message to make it clearer why we don't call it
    "minor" (Matt Roper and Tvrtko)
  - Rename variables s/*_ver_release/*_rel/ and print them in a single
    line formatted as {ver}.{rel:2} (Jani and Matt Roper)

Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210707235921.2416911-2-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
(cherry picked from commit ca6374e2

)
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>

Brevity is not needed here, so just spell out "* version" in the string.

Suggested-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210707235921.2416911-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
(cherry picked from commit 0f9b145a

)
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>

Workarounds are documented in the bspec with an exclusive upper bound
(i.e., a "fixed" stepping that no longer needs the workaround).  This
makes our driver's use of an inclusive upper bound for stepping ranges
confusing; the differing notation between code and bspec makes it very
easy for mistakes to creep in.

Let's switch the upper bound of our IS_{GT,DISP}_STEP macros over to use
an exclusive upper bound like the bspec does.  This also has the benefit
of helping make sure workarounds are properly handled for new minor
steppings that show up (e.g., an A1 between the A0 and B0 we already
knew about) --- if the new intermediate stepping pulls in hardware fixes
early, there will be an update to the workaround definition which lets
us know we need to change our code.  If the new stepping does not pull a
hardware fix earlier, then the new stepping will already be captured
properly by the "[begin, fix)" range in the code.

We'll probably need to be extra vigilant in code review of new
workarounds for the near future to make sure developers notice the new
semantics of workaround bounds.  But we just migrated a bunch of our
platforms from the IS_REVID bounds over to IS_{GT,DISP}_STEP, so people
are already adjusting to the new macros and now is a good time to make
this change too.

[mattrope: Split out display changes to apply through intel-next tree]
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210717051426.4120328-8-matthew.d.roper@intel.com

RKL doesn't have PSR2 support, so PSR2-related workarounds no longer
apply.

Bspec: 53273
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210717051426.4120328-7-matthew.d.roper@intel.com

Bspec: 53273
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210717051426.4120328-6-matthew.d.roper@intel.com

Extend the workaround bound to include A1 display.

Bspec: 54370
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210717051426.4120328-5-matthew.d.roper@intel.com

Currently when we do the HW state readout, we dont set the shared dpll to NULL
for the bigjoiner slave which should not have a DPLL assigned. So it has
some garbage while the HW state readout is NULL. So explicitly reset
the shared dpll for bigjoiner slave pipe.

Bug: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/3465


Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Tested-by: Swati Sharma <swati2.sharma@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210714223414.9849-1-manasi.d.navare@intel.com

This is now a requirement for all display 12 and newer, not only for
tigerlake.

BSpec: 50422
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210625235600.765677-2-jose.souza@intel.com

Implements changes around PSR for alderlake-P:

- EDP_SU_TRACK_ENABLE was removed and bit 30 now has other function
- Some bits of PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL moved and SF_PARTIAL_FRAME_UPDATE was
  removed setting SU_REGION_START/END_ADDR will do this job
- SU_REGION_START/END_ADDR have now line granularity but will need to
  be aligned with DSC when the PSRS + DSC support lands

BSpec: 50422
BSpec: 50424
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210625235600.765677-1-jose.souza@intel.com

Set DSC BPP to the value forced through
debugfs. It can go from bpc to bpp-1.

v2: Use default dsc bpp when we are just
    doing force_dsc_en, use default dsc bpp
    for invalid force_dsc_bpp values. (Jani)

Signed-off-by: Vandita Kulkarni <vandita.kulkarni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Swati Sharma <swati2.sharma@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210720064907.9771-4-vandita.kulkarni@intel.com

This patch creates a per connector debugfs node to expose
the Compressed BPP. The same node can be used from userspace
to force DSC to a certain BPP(all accepted values).

This is useful to verify all supported/requested
compression bpp's through IGT

v2: Remove unnecessary logic (Jani)
v3: Drop pipe bpp in debugfs node (Vandita)
v4: Minor cleanups (Vandita)
v5: Fix NULL pointer dereference
v6: Fix dim tool checkpatch errors
    Release the lock before return (Vandita)
v7: Rename to file to dsc_bpp, remove unwanted
    dsc bpp range check from v6, permissions (Jani)

Cc: Vandita Kulkarni <vandita.kulkarni@intel.com>
Cc: Navare Manasi D <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Patnana Venkata Sai <venkata.sai.patnana@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Vandita Kulkarni <vandita.kulkarni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210720064907.9771-3-vandita.kulkarni@intel.com

Though there is a write option available on  fec_suport
debugfs file, so far it has been registering with read
permissions only.

Suggested-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Vandita Kulkarni <vandita.kulkarni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210720064907.9771-2-vandita.kulkarni@intel.com

The switch from old old IS_FOO_REVID() macros to the new table-based
IS_FOO_{GT,DISP}_STEP() macros is needed on both drm-intel-next (for
display-based DMC matching) and drm-intel-gt-next (for workaround
guards).  To avoid conflicts, we'll apply the patches to a topic branch
and merge it to both intel branches to ensure the transition to the
new macros is clean.

Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>