Skip to content
Commit e75bafbf authored by J. Bruce Fields's avatar J. Bruce Fields
Browse files

svcrpc: make svc_age_temp_xprts enqueue under sv_lock



svc_age_temp_xprts expires xprts in a two-step process: first it takes
the sv_lock and moves the xprts to expire off their server-wide list
(sv_tempsocks or sv_permsocks) to a local list.  Then it drops the
sv_lock and enqueues and puts each one.

I see no reason for this: svc_xprt_enqueue() will take sp_lock, but the
sv_lock and sp_lock are not otherwise nested anywhere (and documentation
at the top of this file claims it's correct to nest these with sp_lock
inside.)

Cc: stable@kernel.org
Tested-by: default avatarJason Tibbitts <tibbs@math.uh.edu>
Tested-by: default avatarPaweł Sikora <pawel.sikora@agmk.net>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
parent f25cc71e
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment