arm64: ftrace: use HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_RET_ADDR_PTR
When CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER is selected and the function graph tracer is in use, unwind_frame() may erroneously associate a traced function with an incorrect return address. This can happen when starting an unwind from a pt_regs, or when unwinding across an exception boundary. This can be seen when recording with perf while the function graph tracer is in use. For example: | # echo function_graph > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/current_tracer | # perf record -g -e raw_syscalls:sys_enter:k /bin/true | # perf report ... reports the callchain erroneously as: | el0t_64_sync | el0t_64_sync_handler | el0_svc_common.constprop.0 | perf_callchain | get_perf_callchain | syscall_trace_enter | syscall_trace_enter ... whereas when the function graph tracer is not in use, it reports: | el0t_64_sync | el0t_64_sync_handler | el0_svc | do_el0_svc | el0_svc_common.constprop.0 | syscall_trace_enter | syscall_trace_enter The underlying problem is that ftrace_graph_get_ret_stack() takes an index offset from the most recent entry added to the fgraph return stack. We start an unwind at offset 0, and increment the offset each time we encounter a rewritten return address (i.e. when we see `return_to_handler`). This is broken in two cases: 1) Between creating a pt_regs and starting the unwind, function calls may place entries on the stack, leaving an arbitrary offset which we can only determine by performing a full unwind from the caller of the unwind code (and relying on none of the unwind code being instrumented). This can result in erroneous entries being reported in a backtrace recorded by perf or kfence when the function graph tracer is in use. Currently show_regs() is unaffected as dump_backtrace() performs an initial unwind. 2) When unwinding across an exception boundary (whether continuing an unwind or starting a new unwind from regs), we currently always skip the LR of the interrupted context. Where this was live and contained a rewritten address, we won't consume the corresponding fgraph ret stack entry, leaving subsequent entries off-by-one. This can result in erroneous entries being reported in a backtrace performed by any in-kernel unwinder when that backtrace crosses an exception boundary, with entries after the boundary being reported incorrectly. This includes perf, kfence, show_regs(), panic(), etc. To fix this, we need to be able to uniquely identify each rewritten return address such that we can map this back to the original return address. We can use HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_RET_ADDR_PTR to associate each rewritten return address with a unique location on the stack. As the return address is passed in the LR (and so is not guaranteed a unique location in memory), we use the FP upon entry to the function (i.e. the address of the caller's frame record) as the return address pointer. Any nested call will have a different FP value as the caller must create its own frame record and update FP to point to this. Since ftrace_graph_ret_addr() requires the return address with the PAC stripped, the stripping of the PAC is moved before the fixup of the rewritten address. As we would unconditionally strip the PAC, moving this earlier is not harmful, and we can avoid a redundant strip in the return address fixup code. I've tested this with the perf case above, the ftrace selftests, and a number of ad-hoc unwinder tests. The tests all pass, and I have seen no unexpected behaviour as a result of this change. I've tested with pointer authentication under QEMU TCG where magic-sysrq+l correctly recovers the original return addresses. Note that this doesn't fix the issue of skipping a live LR at an exception boundary, which is a more general problem and requires more substantial rework. Were we to consume the LR in all cases this would result in warnings where the interrupted context's LR contains `return_to_handler`, but the FP has been altered, e.g. | func: | <--- ftrace entry ---> // logs FP & LR, rewrites LR | STP FP, LR, [SP, #-16]! | MOV FP, SP | <--- INTERRUPT ---> ... as ftrace_graph_get_ret_stack() fill not find a matching entry, triggering the WARN_ON_ONCE() in unwind_frame(). Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211025164925.GB2001@C02TD0UTHF1T.local Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211027132529.30027-1-mark.rutland@arm.com Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211029162245.39761-1-mark.rutland@arm.com Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Please register or sign in to comment