mm/mglru: respect min_ttl_ms with memcgs

While investigating kswapd "consuming 100% CPU" [1] (also see "mm/mglru:
try to stop at high watermarks"), it was discovered that the memcg LRU can
breach the thrashing protection imposed by min_ttl_ms.

Before the memcg LRU:
  kswapd()
    shrink_node_memcgs()
      mem_cgroup_iter()
        inc_max_seq()  // always hit a different memcg
    lru_gen_age_node()
      mem_cgroup_iter()
        check the timestamp of the oldest generation

After the memcg LRU:
  kswapd()
    shrink_many()
      restart:
        iterate the memcg LRU:
          inc_max_seq()  // occasionally hit the same memcg
          if raced with lru_gen_rotate_memcg():
            goto restart
    lru_gen_age_node()
      mem_cgroup_iter()
        check the timestamp of the oldest generation

Specifically, when the restart happens in shrink_many(), it needs to stick
with the (memcg LRU) generation it began with.  In other words, it should
neither re-read memcg_lru->seq nor age an lruvec of a different
generation.  Otherwise it can hit the same memcg multiple times without
giving lru_gen_age_node() a chance to check the timestamp of that memcg's
oldest generation (against min_ttl_ms).

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/CAK8fFZ4DY+GtBA40Pm7Nn5xCHy+51w3sfxPqkqpqakSXYyX+Wg@mail.gmail.com/

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231208061407.2125867-3-yuzhao@google.com
Fixes: e4dde56c

 ("mm: multi-gen LRU: per-node lru_gen_folio lists")
Signed-off-by: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Tested-by: T.J. Mercier <tjmercier@google.com>
Cc: Charan Teja Kalla <quic_charante@quicinc.com>
Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>
Cc: Jaroslav Pulchart <jaroslav.pulchart@gooddata.com>
Cc: Kairui Song <ryncsn@gmail.com>
Cc: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>