tcp: really ignore MSG_ZEROCOPY if no SO_ZEROCOPY
According to the documentation in msg_zerocopy.rst, the SO_ZEROCOPY flag was introduced because send(2) ignores unknown message flags and any legacy application which was accidentally passing the equivalent of MSG_ZEROCOPY earlier should not see any new behaviour. Before commit f214f915 ("tcp: enable MSG_ZEROCOPY"), a send(2) call which passed the equivalent of MSG_ZEROCOPY without setting SO_ZEROCOPY would succeed. However, after that commit, it fails with -ENOBUFS. So it appears that the SO_ZEROCOPY flag fails to fulfill its intended purpose. Fix it. Fixes: f214f915 ("tcp: enable MSG_ZEROCOPY") Signed-off-by: Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@axis.com> Acked-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Please register or sign in to comment