Skip to content
Commit 4f502245 authored by Jens Axboe's avatar Jens Axboe
Browse files

nvme: wire up completion batching for the IRQ path



Trivial to do now, just need our own io_comp_batch on the stack and pass
that in to the usual command completion handling.

I pondered making this dependent on how many entries we had to process,
but even for a single entry there's no discernable difference in
performance or latency. Running a sync workload over io_uring:

t/io_uring -b512 -d1 -s1 -c1 -p0 -F1 -B1 -n2 /dev/nvme1n1 /dev/nvme2n1

yields the below performance before the patch:

IOPS=254820, BW=124MiB/s, IOS/call=1/1, inflight=(1 1)
IOPS=251174, BW=122MiB/s, IOS/call=1/1, inflight=(1 1)
IOPS=250806, BW=122MiB/s, IOS/call=1/1, inflight=(1 1)

and the following after:

IOPS=255972, BW=124MiB/s, IOS/call=1/1, inflight=(1 1)
IOPS=251920, BW=123MiB/s, IOS/call=1/1, inflight=(1 1)
IOPS=251794, BW=122MiB/s, IOS/call=1/1, inflight=(1 1)

which definitely isn't slower, about the same if you factor in a bit of
variance. For peak performance workloads, benchmarking shows a 2%
improvement.

Reviewed-by: default avatarChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
parent b688f11e
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment