Skip to content
Commit 440ffcdd authored by Jakub Kicinski's avatar Jakub Kicinski
Browse files

Merge https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf

Daniel Borkmann says:

====================
pull-request: bpf 2021-10-26

We've added 12 non-merge commits during the last 7 day(s) which contain
a total of 23 files changed, 118 insertions(+), 98 deletions(-).

The main changes are:

1) Fix potential race window in BPF tail call compatibility check, from Toke Høiland-Jørgensen.

2) Fix memory leak in cgroup fs due to missing cgroup_bpf_offline(), from Quanyang Wang.

3) Fix file descriptor reference counting in generic_map_update_batch(), from Xu Kuohai.

4) Fix bpf_jit_limit knob to the max supported limit by the arch's JIT, from Lorenz Bauer.

5) Fix BPF sockmap ->poll callbacks for UDP and AF_UNIX sockets, from Cong Wang and Yucong Sun.

6) Fix BPF sockmap concurrency issue in TCP on non-blocking sendmsg calls, from Liu Jian.

7) Fix build failure of INODE_STORAGE and TASK_STORAGE maps on !CONFIG_NET, from Tejun Heo.

* https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf:
  bpf: Fix potential race in tail call compatibility check
  bpf: Move BPF_MAP_TYPE for INODE_STORAGE and TASK_STORAGE outside of CONFIG_NET
  selftests/bpf: Use recv_timeout() instead of retries
  net: Implement ->sock_is_readable() for UDP and AF_UNIX
  skmsg: Extract and reuse sk_msg_is_readable()
  net: Rename ->stream_memory_read to ->sock_is_readable
  tcp_bpf: Fix one concurrency problem in the tcp_bpf_send_verdict function
  cgroup: Fix memory leak caused by missing cgroup_bpf_offline
  bpf: Fix error usage of map_fd and fdget() in generic_map_update_batch()
  bpf: Prevent increasing bpf_jit_limit above max
  bpf: Define bpf_jit_alloc_exec_limit for arm64 JIT
  bpf: Define bpf_jit_alloc_exec_limit for riscv JIT
====================

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211026201920.11296-1-daniel@iogearbox.net


Signed-off-by: default avatarJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
parents 19fa0887 54713c85
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment