Skip to content
Commit 1687d8ac authored by Linus Torvalds's avatar Linus Torvalds
Browse files

Merge tag 'x86_apic_for_6.6-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip

Pull x86 apic updates from Dave Hansen:
 "This includes a very thorough rework of the 'struct apic' handlers.
  Quite a variety of them popped up over the years, especially in the
  32-bit days when odd apics were much more in vogue.

  The end result speaks for itself, which is a removal of a ton of code
  and static calls to replace indirect calls.

  If there's any breakage here, it's likely to be around the 32-bit
  museum pieces that get light to no testing these days.

  Summary:

   - Rework apic callbacks, getting rid of unnecessary ones and
     coalescing lots of silly duplicates.

   - Use static_calls() instead of indirect calls for apic->foo()

   - Tons of cleanups an crap removal along the way"

* tag 'x86_apic_for_6.6-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (64 commits)
  x86/apic: Turn on static calls
  x86/apic: Provide static call infrastructure for APIC callbacks
  x86/apic: Wrap IPI calls into helper functions
  x86/apic: Mark all hotpath APIC callback wrappers __always_inline
  x86/xen/apic: Mark apic __ro_after_init
  x86/apic: Convert other overrides to apic_update_callback()
  x86/apic: Replace acpi_wake_cpu_handler_update() and apic_set_eoi_cb()
  x86/apic: Provide apic_update_callback()
  x86/xen/apic: Use standard apic driver mechanism for Xen PV
  x86/apic: Provide common init infrastructure
  x86/apic: Wrap apic->native_eoi() into a helper
  x86/apic: Nuke ack_APIC_irq()
  x86/apic: Remove pointless arguments from [native_]eoi_write()
  x86/apic/noop: Tidy up the code
  x86/apic: Remove pointless NULL initializations
  x86/apic: Sanitize APIC ID range validation
  x86/apic: Prepare x2APIC for using apic::max_apic_id
  x86/apic: Simplify X2APIC ID validation
  x86/apic: Add max_apic_id member
  x86/apic: Wrap APIC ID validation into an inline
  ...
parents 87fa732d f8542a55
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment