drm/i915/execlists: Drop request-before-CS assertion
When we migrated to execlists, one of the conditions we wanted to test for was whether the breadcrumb seqno was being written before the breadcumb interrupt was delivered. This was following on from issues observed on previous generations which were not so strongly ordered. With the removal of the missed interrupt detection, we have not reliable means of detecting the out-of-order seqno/interrupt but instead tried to assert that the relationship between the CS event interrupt and the breadwrite should be strongly ordered. However, Icelake proves it is possible for the HW implementation to forget about minor little details such as write ordering and so the order between *processing* the CS event and the breadcrumb is unreliable. Remove the unreliable assertion, but leave a debug telltale in case we have reason to suspect. Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/1658 Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200422141749.28709-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Please register or sign in to comment