- Jun 16, 2020
-
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by:
Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by:
Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by:
Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by:
Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by:
Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by:
Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by:
Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by:
Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by:
Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by:
Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by:
Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by:
Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by:
Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by:
Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by:
Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by:
Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by:
Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by:
Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by:
Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by:
Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by:
Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by:
Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by:
Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by:
Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by:
Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by:
Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by:
Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by:
Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by:
Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by:
Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by:
Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by:
Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
-
- Jun 15, 2020
-
-
Linus Torvalds authored
-
git://github.com/micah-morton/linuxLinus Torvalds authored
Pull SafeSetID update from Micah Morton: "Add additional LSM hooks for SafeSetID SafeSetID is capable of making allow/deny decisions for set*uid calls on a system, and we want to add similar functionality for set*gid calls. The work to do that is not yet complete, so probably won't make it in for v5.8, but we are looking to get this simple patch in for v5.8 since we have it ready. We are planning on the rest of the work for extending the SafeSetID LSM being merged during the v5.9 merge window" * tag 'LSM-add-setgid-hook-5.8-author-fix' of git://github.com/micah-morton/linux: security: Add LSM hooks to set*gid syscalls
-
Thomas Cedeno authored
The SafeSetID LSM uses the security_task_fix_setuid hook to filter set*uid() syscalls according to its configured security policy. In preparation for adding analagous support in the LSM for set*gid() syscalls, we add the requisite hook here. Tested by putting print statements in the security_task_fix_setgid hook and seeing them get hit during kernel boot. Signed-off-by:
Thomas Cedeno <thomascedeno@google.com> Signed-off-by:
Micah Morton <mortonm@chromium.org>
-
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linuxLinus Torvalds authored
Pull btrfs updates from David Sterba: "This reverts the direct io port to iomap infrastructure of btrfs merged in the first pull request. We found problems in invalidate page that don't seem to be fixable as regressions or without changing iomap code that would not affect other filesystems. There are four reverts in total, but three of them are followup cleanups needed to revert a43a67a2 cleanly. The result is the buffer head based implementation of direct io. Reverts are not great, but under current circumstances I don't see better options" * tag 'for-5.8-part2-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux: Revert "btrfs: switch to iomap_dio_rw() for dio" Revert "fs: remove dio_end_io()" Revert "btrfs: remove BTRFS_INODE_READDIO_NEED_LOCK" Revert "btrfs: split btrfs_direct_IO to read and write part"
-
- Jun 14, 2020
-
-
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/netLinus Torvalds authored
Pull networking fixes from David Miller: 1) Fix cfg80211 deadlock, from Johannes Berg. 2) RXRPC fails to send norigications, from David Howells. 3) MPTCP RM_ADDR parsing has an off by one pointer error, fix from Geliang Tang. 4) Fix crash when using MSG_PEEK with sockmap, from Anny Hu. 5) The ucc_geth driver needs __netdev_watchdog_up exported, from Valentin Longchamp. 6) Fix hashtable memory leak in dccp, from Wang Hai. 7) Fix how nexthops are marked as FDB nexthops, from David Ahern. 8) Fix mptcp races between shutdown and recvmsg, from Paolo Abeni. 9) Fix crashes in tipc_disc_rcv(), from Tuong Lien. 10) Fix link speed reporting in iavf driver, from Brett Creeley. 11) When a channel is used for XSK and then reused again later for XSK, we forget to clear out the relevant data structures in mlx5 which causes all kinds of problems. Fix from Maxim Mikityanskiy. 12) Fix memory leak in genetlink, from Cong Wang. 13) Disallow sockmap attachments to UDP sockets, it simply won't work. From Lorenz Bauer. * git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net: (83 commits) net: ethernet: ti: ale: fix allmulti for nu type ale net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpsw-nuss: fix ale parameters init net: atm: Remove the error message according to the atomic context bpf: Undo internal BPF_PROBE_MEM in BPF insns dump libbpf: Support pre-initializing .bss global variables tools/bpftool: Fix skeleton codegen bpf: Fix memlock accounting for sock_hash bpf: sockmap: Don't attach programs to UDP sockets bpf: tcp: Recv() should return 0 when the peer socket is closed ibmvnic: Flush existing work items before device removal genetlink: clean up family attributes allocations net: ipa: header pad field only valid for AP->modem endpoint net: ipa: program upper nibbles of sequencer type net: ipa: fix modem LAN RX endpoint id net: ipa: program metadata mask differently ionic: add pcie_print_link_status rxrpc: Fix race between incoming ACK parser and retransmitter net/mlx5: E-Switch, Fix some error pointer dereferences net/mlx5: Don't fail driver on failure to create debugfs net/mlx5e: CT: Fix ipv6 nat header rewrite actions ...
-
David Sterba authored
This reverts commit a43a67a2 . This patch reverts the main part of switching direct io implementation to iomap infrastructure. There's a problem in invalidate page that couldn't be solved as regression in this development cycle. The problem occurs when buffered and direct io are mixed, and the ranges overlap. Although this is not recommended, filesystems implement measures or fallbacks to make it somehow work. In this case, fallback to buffered IO would be an option for btrfs (this already happens when direct io is done on compressed data), but the change would be needed in the iomap code, bringing new semantics to other filesystems. Another problem arises when again the buffered and direct ios are mixed, invalidation fails, then -EIO is set on the mapping and fsync will fail, though there's no real error. There have been discussions how to fix that, but revert seems to be the least intrusive option. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/20200528192103.xm45qoxqmkw7i5yl@fiona/ Signed-off-by:
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Grygorii Strashko authored
On AM65xx MCU CPSW2G NUSS and 66AK2E/L NUSS allmulti setting does not allow unregistered mcast packets to pass. This happens, because ALE VLAN entries on these SoCs do not contain port masks for reg/unreg mcast packets, but instead store indexes of ALE_VLAN_MASK_MUXx_REG registers which intended for store port masks for reg/unreg mcast packets. This path was missed by commit 9d1f6447 ("net: ethernet: ti: ale: fix seeing unreg mcast packets with promisc and allmulti disabled"). Hence, fix it by taking into account ALE type in cpsw_ale_set_allmulti(). Fixes: 9d1f6447 ("net: ethernet: ti: ale: fix seeing unreg mcast packets with promisc and allmulti disabled") Signed-off-by:
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> Signed-off-by:
David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
Grygorii Strashko authored
The ALE parameters structure is created on stack, so it has to be reset before passing to cpsw_ale_create() to avoid garbage values. Fixes: 93a76530 ("net: ethernet: ti: introduce am65x/j721e gigabit eth subsystem driver") Signed-off-by:
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> Signed-off-by:
David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-