Skip to content
  1. Oct 27, 2021
  3. Oct 25, 2021
  5. Oct 20, 2021
  7. Sep 28, 2021
  9. Sep 27, 2021
    • Zhenzhong Duan's avatar
      KVM: VMX: Fix a TSX_CTRL_CPUID_CLEAR field mask issue · 5c49d185
      Zhenzhong Duan authored 
      When updating the host's mask for its MSR_IA32_TSX_CTRL user return entry,
clear the mask in the found uret MSR instead of vmx->guest_uret_msrs[i].
Modifying guest_uret_msrs directly is completely broken as 'i' does not
point at the MSR_IA32_TSX_CTRL entry.  In fact, it's guaranteed to be an
out-of-bounds accesses as is always set to kvm_nr_uret_msrs in a prior
loop. By sheer dumb luck, the fallout is limited to "only" failing to
preserve the host's TSX_CTRL_CPUID_CLEAR.  The out-of-bounds access is
benign as it's guaranteed to clear a bit in a guest MSR value, which are
always zero at vCPU creation on both x86-64 and i386.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 8ea8b8d6

 ("KVM: VMX: Use common x86's uret MSR list as the one true list")
Signed-off-by: default avatarZhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarSean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Message-Id: <20210926015545.281083-1-zhenzhong.duan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
      5c49d185
  11. Sep 24, 2021
  13. Sep 23, 2021
  15. Sep 22, 2021
    • Fares Mehanna's avatar
      kvm: x86: Add AMD PMU MSRs to msrs_to_save_all[] · e1fc1553
      Fares Mehanna authored 
      

Intel PMU MSRs is in msrs_to_save_all[], so add AMD PMU MSRs to have a
consistent behavior between Intel and AMD when using KVM_GET_MSRS,
KVM_SET_MSRS or KVM_GET_MSR_INDEX_LIST.

We have to add legacy and new MSRs to handle guests running without
X86_FEATURE_PERFCTR_CORE.

Signed-off-by: default avatarFares Mehanna <faresx@amazon.de>
Message-Id: <20210915133951.22389-1-faresx@amazon.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
      e1fc1553
    • Maxim Levitsky's avatar
      KVM: x86: nVMX: re-evaluate emulation_required on nested VM exit · dbab610a
      Maxim Levitsky authored 
      

If L1 had invalid state on VM entry (can happen on SMM transactions
when we enter from real mode, straight to nested guest),

then after we load 'host' state from VMCS12, the state has to become
valid again, but since we load the segment registers with
__vmx_set_segment we weren't always updating emulation_required.

Update emulation_required explicitly at end of load_vmcs12_host_state.

Signed-off-by: default avatarMaxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210913140954.165665-8-mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
      dbab610a
    • Maxim Levitsky's avatar
      KVM: x86: nVMX: don't fail nested VM entry on invalid guest state if !from_vmentry · c8607e4a
      Maxim Levitsky authored 
      

It is possible that when non root mode is entered via special entry
(!from_vmentry), that is from SMM or from loading the nested state,
the L2 state could be invalid in regard to non unrestricted guest mode,
but later it can become valid.

(for example when RSM emulation restores segment registers from SMRAM)

Thus delay the check to VM entry, where we will check this and fail.

Signed-off-by: default avatarMaxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210913140954.165665-7-mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
      c8607e4a
    • Maxim Levitsky's avatar
      KVM: x86: VMX: synthesize invalid VM exit when emulating invalid guest state · c42dec14
      Maxim Levitsky authored 
      

Since no actual VM entry happened, the VM exit information is stale.
To avoid this, synthesize an invalid VM guest state VM exit.

Suggested-by: default avatarSean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMaxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210913140954.165665-6-mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
      c42dec14
    • Maxim Levitsky's avatar
      KVM: x86: nSVM: refactor svm_leave_smm and smm_enter_smm · 136a55c0
      Maxim Levitsky authored 
      

Use return statements instead of nested if, and fix error
path to free all the maps that were allocated.

Suggested-by: default avatarSean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMaxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210913140954.165665-2-mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
      136a55c0
    • Maxim Levitsky's avatar
      KVM: x86: SVM: call KVM_REQ_GET_NESTED_STATE_PAGES on exit from SMM mode · e85d3e7b
      Maxim Levitsky authored 
      

Currently the KVM_REQ_GET_NESTED_STATE_PAGES on SVM only reloads PDPTRs,
and MSR bitmap, with former not really needed for SMM as SMM exit code
reloads them again from SMRAM'S CR3, and later happens to work
since MSR bitmap isn't modified while in SMM.

Still it is better to be consistient with VMX.

Signed-off-by: default avatarMaxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210913140954.165665-5-mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
      e85d3e7b
    • Maxim Levitsky's avatar
      KVM: x86: reset pdptrs_from_userspace when exiting smm · 37687c40
      Maxim Levitsky authored 
      

When exiting SMM, pdpts are loaded again from the guest memory.

This fixes a theoretical bug, when exit from SMM triggers entry to the
nested guest which re-uses some of the migration
code which uses this flag as a workaround for a legacy userspace.

Signed-off-by: default avatarMaxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210913140954.165665-4-mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
      37687c40
    • Maxim Levitsky's avatar
      KVM: x86: nSVM: restore the L1 host state prior to resuming nested guest on SMM exit · e2e6e449
      Maxim Levitsky authored 
      Otherwise guest entry code might see incorrect L1 state (e.g paging state).

Fixes: 37be407b

 ("KVM: nSVM: Fix L1 state corruption upon return from SMM")

Signed-off-by: default avatarMaxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210913140954.165665-3-mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
      e2e6e449
    • Vitaly Kuznetsov's avatar
      KVM: nVMX: Filter out all unsupported controls when eVMCS was activated · 8d68bad6
      Vitaly Kuznetsov authored 
      Windows Server 2022 with Hyper-V role enabled failed to boot on KVM when
enlightened VMCS is advertised. Debugging revealed there are two exposed
secondary controls it is not happy with: SECONDARY_EXEC_ENABLE_VMFUNC and
SECONDARY_EXEC_SHADOW_VMCS. These controls are known to be unsupported,
as there are no corresponding fields in eVMCSv1 (see the comment above
EVMCS1_UNSUPPORTED_2NDEXEC definition).

Previously, commit 31de3d25 ("x86/kvm/hyper-v: move VMX controls
sanitization out of nested_enable_evmcs()") introduced the required
filtering mechanism for VMX MSRs but for some reason put only known
to be problematic (and not full EVMCS1_UNSUPPORTED_* lists) controls
there.

Note, Windows Server 2022 seems to have gained some sanity check for VMX
MSRs: it doesn't even try to launch a guest when there's something it
doesn't like, nested_evmcs_check_controls() mechanism can't catch the
problem.

Let's be bold this time and instead of playing whack-a-mole just filter out
all unsupported controls from VMX MSRs.

Fixes: 31de3d25

 ("x86/kvm/hyper-v: move VMX controls sanitization out of nested_enable_evmcs()")
Signed-off-by: default avatarVitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210907163530.110066-1-vkuznets@redhat.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
      8d68bad6
    • Sean Christopherson's avatar
      KVM: KVM: Use cpumask_available() to check for NULL cpumask when kicking vCPUs · 0bbc2ca8
      Sean Christopherson authored 
      

Check for a NULL cpumask_var_t when kicking multiple vCPUs via
cpumask_available(), which performs a !NULL check if and only if cpumasks
are configured to be allocated off-stack.  This is a meaningless
optimization, e.g. avoids a TEST+Jcc and TEST+CMOV on x86, but more
importantly helps document that the NULL check is necessary even though
all callers pass in a local variable.

No functional change intended.

Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarSean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarVitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210827092516.1027264-3-vkuznets@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
      0bbc2ca8
    • Sean Christopherson's avatar
      KVM: Clean up benign vcpu->cpu data races when kicking vCPUs · 85b64045
      Sean Christopherson authored 
      Fix a benign data race reported by syzbot+KCSAN[*] by ensuring vcpu->cpu
is read exactly once, and by ensuring the vCPU is booted from guest mode
if kvm_arch_vcpu_should_kick() returns true.  Fix a similar race in
kvm_make_vcpus_request_mask() by ensuring the vCPU is interrupted if
kvm_request_needs_ipi() returns true.

Reading vcpu->cpu before vcpu->mode (via kvm_arch_vcpu_should_kick() or
kvm_request_needs_ipi()) means the target vCPU could get migrated (change
vcpu->cpu) and enter !OUTSIDE_GUEST_MODE between reading vcpu->cpud and
reading vcpu->mode.  If that happens, the kick/IPI will be sent to the
old pCPU, not the new pCPU that is now running the vCPU or reading SPTEs.

Although failing to kick the vCPU is not exactly ideal, practically
speaking it cannot cause a functional issue unless there is also a bug in
the caller, and any such bug would exist regardless of kvm_vcpu_kick()'s
behavior.

The purpose of sending an IPI is purely to get a vCPU into the host (or
out of reading SPTEs) so that the vCPU can recognize a change in state,
e.g. a KVM_REQ_* request.  If vCPU's handling of the state change is
required for correctness, KVM must ensure either the vCPU sees the change
before entering the guest, or that the sender sees the vCPU as running in
guest mode.  All architectures handle this by (a) sending the request
before calling kvm_vcpu_kick() and (b) checking for requests _after_
setting vcpu->mode.

x86's READING_SHADOW_PAGE_TABLES has similar requirements; KVM needs to
ensure it kicks and waits for vCPUs that started reading SPTEs _before_
MMU changes were finalized, but any vCPU that starts reading after MMU
changes were finalized will see the new state and can continue on
uninterrupted.

For uses of kvm_vcpu_kick() that are not paired with a KVM_REQ_*, e.g.
x86's kvm_arch_sync_dirty_log(), the order of the kick must not be relied
upon for functional correctness, e.g. in the dirty log case, userspace
cannot assume it has a 100% complete log if vCPUs are still running.

All that said, eliminate the benign race since the cost of doing so is an
"extra" atomic cmpxchg() in the case where the target vCPU is loaded by
the current pCPU or is not loaded at all.  I.e. the kick will be skipped
due to kvm_vcpu_exiting_guest_mode() seeing a compatible vcpu->mode as
opposed to the kick being skipped because of the cpu checks.

Keep the "cpu != me" checks even though they appear useless/impossible at
first glance.  x86 processes guest IPI writes in a fast path that runs in
IN_GUEST_MODE, i.e. can call kvm_vcpu_kick() from IN_GUEST_MODE.  And
calling kvm_vm_bugged()->kvm_make_vcpus_request_mask() from IN_GUEST or
READING_SHADOW_PAGE_TABLES is perfectly reasonable.

Note, a race with the cpu_online() check in kvm_vcpu_kick() likely
persists, e.g. the vCPU could exit guest mode and get offlined between
the cpu_online() check and the sending of smp_send_reschedule().  But,
the online check appears to exist only to avoid a WARN in x86's
native_smp_send_reschedule() that fires if the target CPU is not online.
The reschedule WARN exists because CPU offlining takes the CPU out of the
scheduling pool, i.e. the WARN is intended to detect the case where the
kernel attempts to schedule a task on an offline CPU.  The actual sending
of the IPI is a non-issue as at worst it will simpy be dropped on the
floor.  In other words, KVM's usurping of the reschedule IPI could
theoretically trigger a WARN if the stars align, but there will be no
loss of functionality.

[*] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=cd4154e502f43f10808a

Cc: Venkatesh Srinivas <venkateshs@google.com>
Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Fixes: 97222cc8

 ("KVM: Emulate local APIC in kernel")
Signed-off-by: default avatarSean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarVitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210827092516.1027264-2-vkuznets@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
      85b64045