Skip to content
  1. Jun 06, 2019
  2. Jun 05, 2019
    • David S. Miller's avatar
      Merge branch 'net-dsa-mv88e6xxx-support-for-mv88e6250' · 2a99283c
      David S. Miller authored
      
      
      Rasmus Villemoes says:
      
      ====================
      net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: support for mv88e6250
      
      This adds support for the mv88e6250 chip. Initially based on the
      mv88e6240, this time around, I've been through each ->ops callback and
      checked that it makes sense, either replacing with a 6250 specific
      variant or dropping it if no equivalent functionality seems to exist
      for the 6250. Along the way, I found a few oddities in the existing
      code, mostly sent as separate patches/questions.
      
      The one relevant to the 6250 is the ieee_pri_map callback, where the
      existing mv88e6085_g1_ieee_pri_map() is actually wrong for many of the
      existing users. I've put the mv88e6250_g1_ieee_pri_map() patch first
      in case some of the existing chips get switched over to use that and
      it is deemed important enough for -stable.
      
      v4:
      - fix style issue in 1/10
      - add Andrew's reviewed-by to 1,6,7,8,9,10.
      
      v3:
      - rebase on top of net-next/master
      - add reviewed-bys to patches unchanged from v2 (2,3,4,5)
      - add 6250-specific ->ieee_pri_map, ->port_set_speed, ->port_link_state (1,6,7)
      - in addition, use mv88e6065_phylink_validate for ->phylink_validate,
        and don't implement ->port_get_cmode, ->port_set_jumbo_size,
        ->port_disable_learn_limit, ->rmu_disable
      - drop ptp support
      - add patch adding the compatible string to the DT binding (9)
      - add small refactoring patch (10)
      
      v2:
      - rebase on top of net-next/master
      - add reviewed-by to two patches unchanged from v1 (2,3)
      - add separate watchdog_ops
      ====================
      
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      2a99283c
    • Rasmus Villemoes's avatar
      net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: refactor mv88e6352_g1_reset · 7358fd80
      Rasmus Villemoes authored
      
      
      The new mv88e6250_g1_reset() is identical to mv88e6352_g1_reset() except
      for the call of mv88e6352_g1_wait_ppu_polling(), so refactor the 6352
      version in term of the 6250 one. No functional change.
      
      Reviewed-by: default avatarAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarRasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      7358fd80
    • Rasmus Villemoes's avatar
      dt-bindings: net: dsa: marvell: add "marvell,mv88e6250" compatible string · dabde0da
      Rasmus Villemoes authored
      
      
      The mv88e6250 has port_base_addr 0x8 or 0x18 (depending on
      configuration pins), so it constitutes a new family and hence needs
      its own compatible string.
      
      Reviewed-by: default avatarAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarRasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      dabde0da
    • Rasmus Villemoes's avatar
      net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: add support for mv88e6250 · 1f71836f
      Rasmus Villemoes authored
      
      
      This adds support for the Marvell 88E6250. I've checked that each
      member in the ops-structure makes sense, and basic switchdev
      functionality works fine.
      
      It uses the new dual_chip option, and since its port registers start
      at SMI address 0x08 or 0x18 (i.e., always sw_addr + 0x08), we need to
      introduce a new compatible string in order for the auto-identification
      in mv88e6xxx_detect() to work.
      
      The chip has four per port 16-bits statistics registers, two of which
      correspond to the existing "sw_in_filtered" and "sw_out_filtered" (but
      at offsets 0x13 and 0x10 rather than 0x12 and 0x13, because why should
      this be easy...). Wiring up those four statistics seems to require
      introducing a STATS_TYPE_PORT_6250 bit or similar, which seems a tad
      ugly, so for now this just allows access to the STATS_TYPE_BANK0 ones.
      
      The chip does have ptp support, and the existing
      mv88e6352_{gpio,avb,ptp}_ops at first glance seem like they would work
      out-of-the-box, but for simplicity (and lack of testing) I'm eliding
      this.
      
      Reviewed-by: default avatarAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarRasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      1f71836f
    • Rasmus Villemoes's avatar
      net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: implement port_link_state for mv88e6250 · ce91c453
      Rasmus Villemoes authored
      
      
      The mv88e6250 has a rather different way of reporting the link, speed
      and duplex status. A simple difference is that the link bit is bit 12
      rather than bit 11 of the port status register.
      
      It gets more complicated for speed and duplex, which do not have
      separate fields. Instead, there's a four-bit PortMode field, and
      decoding that depends on whether it's a phy or mii port. For the phy
      ports, only four of the 16 values have defined meaning; the rest are
      called "reserved", so returning {SPEED,DUPLEX}_UNKNOWN seems
      reasonable.
      
      For the mii ports, most possible values are documented (0x3 and 0x5
      are reserved), but I'm unable to make sense of them all. Since the
      bits simply reflect the Px_MODE[3:0] configuration pins, just support
      the subset that I'm certain about. Support for other setups can be
      added later.
      
      Reviewed-by: default avatarAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarRasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      ce91c453
    • Rasmus Villemoes's avatar
      net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: implement port_set_speed for mv88e6250 · a528e5be
      Rasmus Villemoes authored
      
      
      The data sheet also mentions the possibility of selecting 200 Mbps for
      the MII ports (ports 5 and 6) by setting the ForceSpd field to
      0x2 (aka MV88E6065_PORT_MAC_CTL_SPEED_200). However, there's a note
      that "actual speed is determined by bit 8 above", and flipping back a
      page, one finds that bits 13:8 are reserved...
      
      So without further information on what bit 8 means, let's stick to
      supporting just 10 and 100 Mbps on all ports.
      
      Reviewed-by: default avatarAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarRasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      a528e5be
    • Rasmus Villemoes's avatar
      net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: implement watchdog_ops for mv88e6250 · 855cdfde
      Rasmus Villemoes authored
      
      
      The MV88E6352_G2_WDOG_CTL_* bits almost, but not quite, describe the
      watchdog control register on the mv88e6250. Among those actually
      referenced in the code, only QC_ENABLE differs (bit 6 rather than bit
      5).
      
      Reviewed-by: default avatarAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarVivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarRasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      855cdfde
    • Rasmus Villemoes's avatar
      net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: implement vtu_getnext and vtu_loadpurge for mv88e6250 · bec8e572
      Rasmus Villemoes authored
      
      
      These are almost identical to the 6185 variants, but have fewer bits
      for the FID.
      
      Bit 10 of the VTU_OP register (offset 0x05) is the VidPolicy bit,
      which one should probably preserve in mv88e6xxx_g1_vtu_op(), instead
      of always writing a 0. However, on the 6352 family, that bit is
      located at bit 12 in the VTU FID register (offset 0x02), and is always
      unconditionally cleared by the mv88e6xxx_g1_vtu_fid_write()
      function.
      
      Since nothing in the existing driver seems to know or care about that
      bit, it seems reasonable to not add the boilerplate to preserve it for
      the 6250 (which would require adding a chip-specific vtu_op function,
      or adding chip-quirks to the existing one).
      
      Reviewed-by: default avatarAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarVivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarRasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      bec8e572
    • Rasmus Villemoes's avatar
      net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: prepare mv88e6xxx_g1_atu_op() for the mv88e6250 · 7b83df0d
      Rasmus Villemoes authored
      
      
      All the currently supported chips have .num_databases either 256 or
      4096, so this patch does not change behaviour for any of those. The
      mv88e6250, however, has .num_databases == 64, and it does not put the
      upper two bits in ATU control 13:12, but rather in ATU Operation
      9:8. So change the logic to prepare for supporting mv88e6250.
      
      Reviewed-by: default avatarAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarVivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarRasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      7b83df0d
    • Rasmus Villemoes's avatar
      net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: introduce support for two chips using direct smi addressing · f30a19b8
      Rasmus Villemoes authored
      
      
      The 88e6250 (as well as 6220, 6071, 6070, 6020) do not support
      multi-chip (indirect) addressing. However, one can still have two of
      them on the same mdio bus, since the device only uses 16 of the 32
      possible addresses, either addresses 0x00-0x0F or 0x10-0x1F depending
      on the ADDR4 pin at reset [since ADDR4 is internally pulled high, the
      latter is the default].
      
      In order to prepare for supporting the 88e6250 and friends, introduce
      mv88e6xxx_info::dual_chip to allow having a non-zero sw_addr while
      still using direct addressing.
      
      Reviewed-by: default avatarVivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarRasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      f30a19b8
    • Rasmus Villemoes's avatar
      net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: add mv88e6250_g1_ieee_pri_map · df63b0d9
      Rasmus Villemoes authored
      
      
      Quite a few of the existing supported chips that use
      mv88e6085_g1_ieee_pri_map as ->ieee_pri_map (including, incidentally,
      mv88e6085 itself) actually have a reset value of 0xfa50 in the
      G1_IEEE_PRI register.
      
      The data sheet for the mv88e6095, however, does describe a reset value
      of 0xfa41.
      
      So rather than changing the value in the existing callback, introduce
      a new variant with the 0xfa50 value. That will be used by the upcoming
      mv88e6250, and existing chips can be switched over one by one,
      preferably double-checking both the data sheet and actual hardware in
      each case - if anybody actually feels this is important enough to
      care.
      
      Reviewed-by: default avatarAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarRasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      df63b0d9
    • Ronak Doshi's avatar
      vmxnet3: turn off lro when rxcsum is disabled · 3dd7400b
      Ronak Doshi authored
      
      
      Currently, when rx csum is disabled, vmxnet3 driver does not turn
      off lro, which can cause performance issues if user does not turn off
      lro explicitly. This patch adds fix_features support which is used to
      turn off LRO whenever RXCSUM is disabled.
      
      Signed-off-by: default avatarRonak Doshi <doshir@vmware.com>
      Acked-by: default avatarRishi Mehta <rmehta@vmware.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      3dd7400b
    • David S. Miller's avatar
      Merge branch 'net-add-struct-nexthop-to-fib-info' · 9ec49a7e
      David S. Miller authored
      
      
      David Ahern says:
      
      ====================
      net: add struct nexthop to fib{6}_info
      
      Set 10 of 11 to improve route scalability via support for nexthops as
      standalone objects for fib entries.
          https://lwn.net/Articles/763950/
      
      This sets adds 'struct nexthop' to fib_info and fib6_info. IPv4
      already handles multiple fib_nh entries in a single fib_info, so
      the conversion to use a nexthop struct is fairly mechanical. IPv6
      using a nexthop struct with a fib6_info impacts a lot of core logic
      which is built around the assumption of a single, builtin fib6_nh
      per fib6_info. To make this easier to review, this set adds
      nexthop to fib6_info and adds checks in most places fib6_info is
      used. The next set finishes the IPv6 conversion, walking through
      the places that need to consider all fib6_nh within a nexthop struct.
      
      Offload drivers - mlx5, mlxsw and rocker - are changed to fail FIB
      entries using nexthop objects. That limitation can be removed once
      the drivers are updated to properly support separate nexthops.
      
      This set starts by adding accessors for fib_nh and fib_nhs in a
      fib_info. This makes it easier to extract the number of nexthops
      in the fib entry and a specific fib_nh once the entry references
      a struct nexthop. Patch 2 converts more of IPv4 code to use
      fib_nh_common allowing a struct nexthop to use a fib6_nh with an
      IPv4 entry.
      
      Patches 3 and 4 add 'struct nexthop' to fib{6}_info and update
      references to both take a different path when it is set. New
      exported functions are added to the nexthop code to validate a
      nexthop struct when configured for use with a fib entry. IPv4
      is allowed to use a nexthop with either v4 or v6 entries. IPv6
      is limited to v6 entries only. In both cases list_heads track
      the fib entries using a nexthop struct for fast correlation on
      events (e.g., device events or nexthop events like delete or
      replace).
      
      The last 3 patches add hooks to drivers listening for FIB
      notificationas. All 3 of them reject the routes as unsupported,
      returning an error message to the user via extack. For mlxsw
      at least this is a stop gap measure until the driver is updated for
      proper support.
      
      Functional tests for nexthops have already been committed. Those tests
      will be active after the next patch set which makes the code paths
      created by this set and the next one live.
      
      Existing code paths moved to the else branch of 'if (f{6}i->nh)' checks
      are covered by existing tests under selftests/net.
      
      v3
      - remove ip6_create_rt_rcu from ip6_pol_route in patch 4 and use pcpu
        routes for REJECT routes with the blackhole nexthop (request from Wei)
      
      v2
      - no code changes from v1
      - commit messages for first 4 patches updated
      ====================
      
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      9ec49a7e
    • David Ahern's avatar
      rocker: Fail attempts to use routes with nexthop objects · dbcc4fa7
      David Ahern authored
      
      
      Fail attempts to use nexthop objects with routes until support can be
      properly added.
      
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      dbcc4fa7
    • David Ahern's avatar
      mlx5: Fail attempts to use routes with nexthop objects · 6a87afc0
      David Ahern authored
      
      
      Fail attempts to use nexthop objects with routes until support can be
      properly added.
      
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      6a87afc0
    • David Ahern's avatar
      mlxsw: Fail attempts to use routes with nexthop objects · 54250805
      David Ahern authored
      
      
      Fail attempts to use nexthop objects with routes until support can be
      properly added.
      
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      54250805