Add the cpufeature and hwcap entries to detect the presence of MTE. Any
secondary CPU not supporting the feature, if detected on the boot CPU,
will be parked.

Add the minimum SCTLR_EL1 and HCR_EL2 bits for enabling MTE. The Normal
Tagged memory type is configured in MAIR_EL1 before the MMU is enabled
in order to avoid disrupting other CPUs in the CnP domain.

Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>
Co-developed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com>

Replace the existing /* fall through */ comments and its variants with
the new pseudo-keyword macro fallthrough[1]. Also, remove unnecessary
fall-through markings when it is the case.

[1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.7/process/deprecated.html?highlight=fallthrough#implicit-switch-case-fall-through



Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>

ARMv8.4-TLBI provides TLBI invalidation instruction that apply to a
range of input addresses. This patch detect this feature.

Signed-off-by: Zhenyu Ye <yezhenyu2@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200715071945.897-2-yezhenyu2@huawei.com


[catalin.marinas@arm.com: some renaming for consistency]
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

arm64_feature_bits for a register in arm64_ftr_regs[] are in a descending
order as per their shift values. Validate that these features bits are
defined correctly and do not overlap with each other. This check protects
against any inadvertent erroneous changes to the register definitions.

Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1594131793-9498-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com


Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

In order to reduce the cost of TLB invalidation, the ARMv8.4 TTL
feature allows TLBs to be issued with a level allowing for quicker
invalidation.

Let's detect the feature for now. Further patches will implement
its actual usage.

Reviewed-by : Suzuki K Polose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>

There are many open bits shift encodings for various CPU ID registers that
are scattered across cpufeature. This replaces them with register specific
sensible macro definitions. This should not have any functional change.

Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1593748297-1965-5-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com


Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

Enable EVT, BBM, TTL, IDS, ST, NV and CCIDX features bits in ID_AA64MMFR2
register as per ARM DDI 0487F.a specification.

Suggested-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1593748297-1965-4-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com


Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

Enable ETS, TWED, XNX and SPECSEI features bits in ID_AA64MMFR1 register as
per ARM DDI 0487F.a specification.

Suggested-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1593748297-1965-3-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com


Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

Enable EVC, FGT, EXS features bits in ID_AA64MMFR0 register as per ARM DDI
0487F.a specification.

Suggested-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1593748297-1965-2-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com


Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

KRYO4XX silver/LITTLE CPU cores with revision r1p0 are affected by
erratum 1530923 and 1024718, so add them to the respective list.
The variant and revision bits are implementation defined and are
different from the their Cortex CPU counterparts on which they are
based on, i.e., r1p0 is equivalent to rdpe.

Signed-off-by: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/7013e8a3f857ca7e82863cc9e34a614293d7f80c.1593539394.git.saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org


Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

Currently there are three different registered panic notifier blocks. This
unifies all of them into a single one i.e arm64_panic_block, hence reducing
code duplication and required calling sequence during panic. This preserves
the existing dump sequence. While here, just use device_initcall() directly
instead of __initcall() which has been a legacy alias for the earlier. This
replacement is a pure cleanup with no functional implications.

Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Steve Capper <steve.capper@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1593405511-7625-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com


Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

QCOM KRYO{3,4}XX silver/LITTLE CPU cores are based on Cortex-A55
and are meltdown safe, hence add them to kpti_safe_list[].

Signed-off-by: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200624123406.3472-1-saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org


Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

With ARMv8.5-GTG, the hardware (or more likely a hypervisor) can
advertise the supported Stage-2 page sizes.

Let's check this at boot time.

Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

There is no way to proceed when requested register could not be searched in
arm64_ftr_reg[]. Requesting for a non present register would be an error as
well. Hence lets just WARN_ON() when search fails in get_arm64_ftr_reg()
rather than checking for return value and doing a BUG_ON() instead in some
individual callers. But there are also caller instances that dont error out
when register search fails. Add a new helper get_arm64_ftr_reg_nowarn() for
such cases.

Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1590573876-19120-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com


Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

ID_MMFR4_EL1 has been missing in the CPU context (i.e cpuinfo_arm64). This
just adds the register along with other required changes.

Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Suggested-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1589881254-10082-18-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com


Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

Enable the following features bits in ID_AA64PFR1 register as per ARM DDI
0487F.a specification.

Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Suggested-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1589881254-10082-12-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com


Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

Enable MPAM and SEL2 features bits in ID_AA64PFR0 register as per ARM DDI
0487F.a specification.

Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Suggested-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1589881254-10082-11-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com


[will: Make SEL2 a NONSTRICT feature per Suzuki]
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

Enable TLB features bit in ID_AA64ISAR0 register as per ARM DDI 0487F.a
specification.

Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Suggested-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1589881254-10082-10-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com


Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

Enable all remaining feature bits like EVT, CCIDX, LSM, HPDS, CnP, XNX,
SpecSEI in ID_MMFR4 register per ARM DDI 0487F.a.

Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1589881254-10082-9-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com


Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

Enable DIT and CSV2 feature bits in ID_PFR0 register as per ARM DDI 0487F.a
specification. Except RAS and AMU, all other feature bits are now enabled.

Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1589881254-10082-8-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com


Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

This adds basic building blocks required for ID_MMFR5 CPU register which
provides information about the implemented memory model and memory
management support in AArch32 state. This is added per ARM DDI 0487F.a
specification.

Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Suggested-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1589881254-10082-7-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com


Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

This adds basic building blocks required for ID_DFR1 CPU register which
provides top level information about the debug system in AArch32 state.
We hide the register from KVM guests, as we don't emulate the 'MTPMU'
feature.

This is added per ARM DDI 0487F.a specification.

Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Suggested-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by : Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1589881254-10082-6-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com


Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

This adds basic building blocks required for ID_PFR2 CPU register which
provides information about the AArch32 programmers model which must be
interpreted along with ID_PFR0 and ID_PFR1 CPU registers. This is added
per ARM DDI 0487F.a specification.

Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1589881254-10082-5-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com


Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

Double lock feature can have the following possible values.

0b0000 - Double lock implemented
0b1111 - Double lock not implemented

But in case of a conflict the safe value should be 0b1111. Hence this must
be a signed feature instead. Also change FTR_EXACT to FTR_LOWER_SAFE. While
here, fix the erroneous bit width value from 28 to 4.

Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Suggested-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1589881254-10082-4-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com


Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

ID_DFR0 based TraceFilt feature should not be exposed to guests. Hence lets
drop it.

Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1589881254-10082-3-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com


Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

ID_ISAR0[31..28] bits are RES0 in ARMv8, Reserved/UNK in ARMv7. Currently
these bits get exposed through generic_id_ftr32[] which is not desirable.
Hence define an explicit ftr_id_isar0[] array for ID_ISAR0 register where
those bits can be hidden.

Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1589881254-10082-2-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com


Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

Currently there are multiple instances of parange feature width mask open
encodings while fetching it's value. Even the width mask value (0x7) itself
is not accurate. It should be (0xf) per ID_AA64MMFR0_EL1.PARange[3:0] as in
ARM ARM (0487F.a). Replace them with cpuid_feature_extract_unsigned_field()
which can extract given standard feature (4 bits width i.e 0xf mask) field.

Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1589360614-1164-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com


Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

This validates hypervisor capabilities like VMID width, IPA range for any
hot plug CPU against system finalized values. KVM's view of the IPA space
is used while allowing a given CPU to come up. While here, it factors out
get_vmid_bits() for general use.

Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Suggested-by: Suzuki Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1589248647-22925-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com


Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

Now that the kernel is built with BTI annotations enable the feature by
setting the GP bit in the stage 1 translation tables.  This is done
based on the features supported by the boot CPU so that we do not need
to rewrite the translation tables.

In order to avoid potential issues on big.LITTLE systems when there are
a mix of BTI and non-BTI capable CPUs in the system when we have enabled
kernel mode BTI we change BTI to be a _STRICT_BOOT_CPU_FEATURE when we
have kernel BTI.  This will prevent any CPUs that don't support BTI
being started if the boot CPU supports BTI rather than simply not using
BTI as we do when supporting BTI only in userspace.  The main concern is
the possibility of BTYPE being preserved by a CPU that does not
implement BTI when a thread is migrated to it resulting in an incorrect
state which could generate an exception when the thread migrates back to
a CPU that does support BTI.  If we encounter practical systems which
mix BTI and non-BTI CPUs we will need to revisit this implementation.

Since we currently do not generate landing pads in the BPF JIT we only
map the base kernel text in this way.

Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200506195138.22086-5-broonie@kernel.org


Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

When a feature register field is omitted from the description of the
register, the corresponding bits are treated as STRICT RES0, including
for KVM guests. This is subtly different to declaring the field as
HIDDEN/STRICT/EXACT/0, so update the comment to call this out.

Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

Now that Suzuki isn't within throwing distance, I thought I'd better add
a rough overview comment to cpufeature.c so that it doesn't take me days
to remember how it works next time.

Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200421142922.18950-9-will@kernel.org


Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

We don't need to be quite as strict about mismatched AArch32 support,
which is good because the friendly hardware folks have been busy
mismatching this to their hearts' content.

  * We don't care about EL2 or EL3 (there are silly comments concerning
    the latter, so remove those)

  * EL1 support is gated by the ARM64_HAS_32BIT_EL1 capability and handled
    gracefully when a mismatch occurs

  * EL0 support is gated by the ARM64_HAS_32BIT_EL0 capability and handled
    gracefully when a mismatch occurs

Relax the AArch32 checks to FTR_NONSTRICT.

Tested-by: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200421142922.18950-8-will@kernel.org


Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

If AArch32 is not supported at EL1, the AArch32 feature register fields
no longer advertise support for some system features:

  * ISAR4.SMC
  * PFR1.{Virt_frac, Sec_frac, Virtualization, Security, ProgMod}

In which case, we don't need to emit "SANITY CHECK" failures for all of
them.

Add logic to relax the strictness of individual feature register fields
at runtime and use this for the fields above if 32-bit EL1 is not
supported.

Tested-by: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200421142922.18950-7-will@kernel.org


Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

update_cpu_features() is pretty large, so split out the checking of the
AArch32 features into a separate function and call it after checking the
AArch64 features.

Tested-by: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200421142922.18950-6-will@kernel.org


Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

There's no need to call id_aa64pfr0_32bit_el0() twice because the
sanitised value of ID_AA64PFR0_EL1 has already been updated for the CPU
being onlined.

Remove the redundant function call.

Tested-by: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200421142922.18950-5-will@kernel.org


Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

Although we emit a "SANITY CHECK" warning and taint the kernel if we
detect a CPU mismatch for AArch32 support at EL1, we still online the
CPU with disastrous consequences for any running 32-bit VMs.

Introduce a capability for AArch32 support at EL1 so that late onlining
of incompatible CPUs is forbidden.

Tested-by: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200421142922.18950-4-will@kernel.org


Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

In preparation for runtime updates to the strictness of some AArch32
features, spell out the register fields for ID_ISAR4 and ID_PFR1 to make
things clearer to read. Note that this isn't functionally necessary, as
the feature arrays themselves are not modified dynamically and remain
'const'.

Tested-by: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200421142922.18950-3-will@kernel.org


Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

We don't care if IESB is supported or not as we always set
SCTLR_ELx.IESB and, if it works, that's really great.

Relax the ID_AA64MMFR2.IESB cpufeature check so that we don't warn and
taint if it's mismatched.

[will: rewrote commit message]

Signed-off-by: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200421142922.18950-2-will@kernel.org


Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

When the kernel is compiled with pointer auth instructions, the boot CPU
needs to start using address auth very early, so change the cpucap to
account for this.

Pointer auth must be enabled before we call C functions, because it is
not possible to enter a function with pointer auth disabled and exit it
with pointer auth enabled. Note, mismatches between architected and
IMPDEF algorithms will still be caught by the cpufeature framework (the
separate *_ARCH and *_IMP_DEF cpucaps).

Note the change in behavior: if the boot CPU has address auth and a
late CPU does not, then the late CPU is parked by the cpufeature
framework. This is possible as kernel will only have NOP space intructions
for PAC so such mismatched late cpu will silently ignore those
instructions in C functions. Also, if the boot CPU does not have address
auth and the late CPU has then the late cpu will still boot but with
ptrauth feature disabled.

Leave generic authentication as a "system scope" cpucap for now, since
initially the kernel will only use address authentication.

Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Vincenzo Frascino <Vincenzo.Frascino@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Kristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@arm.com>
[Amit: Re-worked ptrauth setup logic, comments]
Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

Each system capability can be of either boot, local, or system scope,
depending on when the state of the capability is finalized. When we
detect a conflict on a late CPU, we either offline the CPU or panic the
system. We currently always panic if the conflict is caused by a boot
scope capability, and offline the CPU if the conflict is caused by a
local or system scope capability.

We're going to want to add a new capability (for pointer authentication)
which needs to be boot scope but doesn't need to panic the system when a
conflict is detected. So add a new flag to specify whether the
capability requires the system to panic or not. Current boot scope
capabilities are updated to set the flag, so there should be no
functional change as a result of this patch.

Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Kristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>