Skip to content
Commit e400ad8b authored by Dave Hansen's avatar Dave Hansen Committed by Dave Hansen
Browse files

ACPI: processor idle: Practically limit "Dummy wait" workaround to old Intel systems



Old, circa 2002 chipsets have a bug: they don't go idle when they are
supposed to.  So, a workaround was added to slow the CPU down and
ensure that the CPU waits a bit for the chipset to actually go idle.
This workaround is ancient and has been in place in some form since
the original kernel ACPI implementation.

But, this workaround is very painful on modern systems.  The "inl()"
can take thousands of cycles (see Link: for some more detailed
numbers and some fun kernel archaeology).

First and foremost, modern systems should not be using this code.
Typical Intel systems have not used it in over a decade because it is
horribly inferior to MWAIT-based idle.

Despite this, people do seem to be tripping over this workaround on
AMD system today.

Limit the "dummy wait" workaround to Intel systems.  Keep Modern AMD
systems from tripping over the workaround.  Remotely modern Intel
systems use intel_idle instead of this code and will, in practice,
remain unaffected by the dummy wait.

Reported-by: default avatarK Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Suggested-by: default avatarRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarMario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Tested-by: default avatarK Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220921063638.2489-1-kprateek.nayak@amd.com/
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220922184745.3252932-1-dave.hansen@intel.com
parent 81fa6fd1
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment