Skip to content
Commit d58335d1 authored by Marc Zyngier's avatar Marc Zyngier
Browse files

Merge branch kvm-arm64/tlbi-range into kvmarm-master/next



* kvm-arm64/tlbi-range:
  : .
  : FEAT_TLBIRANGE support, courtesy of Raghavendra Rao Ananta.
  : From the cover letter:
  :
  : "In certain code paths, KVM/ARM currently invalidates the entire VM's
  : page-tables instead of just invalidating a necessary range. For example,
  : when collapsing a table PTE to a block PTE, instead of iterating over
  : each PTE and flushing them, KVM uses 'vmalls12e1is' TLBI operation to
  : flush all the entries. This is inefficient since the guest would have
  : to refill the TLBs again, even for the addresses that aren't covered
  : by the table entry. The performance impact would scale poorly if many
  : addresses in the VM is going through this remapping.
  :
  : For architectures that implement FEAT_TLBIRANGE, KVM can replace such
  : inefficient paths by performing the invalidations only on the range of
  : addresses that are in scope. This series tries to achieve the same in
  : the areas of stage-2 map, unmap and write-protecting the pages."
  : .
  KVM: arm64: Use TLBI range-based instructions for unmap
  KVM: arm64: Invalidate the table entries upon a range
  KVM: arm64: Flush only the memslot after write-protect
  KVM: arm64: Implement kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs_range()
  KVM: arm64: Define kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_range()
  KVM: arm64: Implement __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_range()
  arm64: tlb: Implement __flush_s2_tlb_range_op()
  arm64: tlb: Refactor the core flush algorithm of __flush_tlb_range
  KVM: Move kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs_memslot() to common code
  KVM: Allow range-based TLB invalidation from common code
  KVM: Remove CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_ARCH_TLB_FLUSH_ALL
  KVM: arm64: Use kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs()
  KVM: Declare kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs() globally
  KVM: Rename kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlb() to kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs()

Signed-off-by: default avatarMarc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
parents c1907626 7657ea92
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Please register or to comment