net: dp83640: Mark expected switch fall-throughs
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. Notice that in this particular case, I replaced the code comment at the top of the switch statement with a proper "fall through" annotation for each case, which is what GCC is expecting to find. Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1056542 ("Missing break in switch") Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1339579 ("Missing break in switch") Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1369526 ("Missing break in switch") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Acked-by: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Please register or sign in to comment