staging: kpc2000: added separate show functions for kpc_uio_class device...

staging: kpc2000: added separate show functions for kpc_uio_class device attributes, defined them as read-only and declared them static.

Defined separate simple show functions for each attribute instead of
having a one big one containing a chain of conditionals.

Replaced scnprintf calls with sprintf since all the outputs are short
bounded strings or single integers.

All of the device attributes are read-only, so used DEVICE_ATTR_RO to
define them.

The definitions are only used to populate the kpc_uio_class_attrs
attribute array, so declared them as static.

Fixes the following sparse warnings:

  drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc2000/cell_probe.c:220:1: warning: symbol 'dev_attr_offset' was not declared. Should it be static?
  drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc2000/cell_probe.c:221:1: warning: symbol 'dev_attr_size' was not declared. Should it be static?
  drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc2000/cell_probe.c:222:1: warning: symbol 'dev_attr_type' was not declared. Should it be static?
  drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc2000/cell_probe.c:223:1: warning: symbol 'dev_attr_s2c_dma' was not declared. Should it be static?
  drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc2000/cell_probe.c:224:1: warning: symbol 'dev_attr_c2s_dma' was not declared. Should it be static?
  drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc2000/cell_probe.c:225:1: warning: symbol 'dev_attr_irq_count' was not declared. Should it be static?
  drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc2000/cell_probe.c:226:1: warning: symbol 'dev_attr_irq_base_num' was not declared. Should it be static?
  drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc2000/cell_probe.c:227:1: warning: symbol 'dev_attr_core_num' was not declared. Should it be static?

Signed-off-by: Jeremy Sowden <jeremy@azazel.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>