KVM: x86: Fix misleading comments on handling pending exceptions

The reason that exception.pending should block re-injection of
NMI/interrupt is not described correctly in comment in code.
Instead, it describes why a pending exception should be injected
before a pending NMI/interrupt.

Therefore, move currently present comment to code-block evaluating
a new pending event which explains why exception.pending is evaluated
first.
In addition, create a new comment describing that exception.pending
blocks re-injection of NMI/interrupt because the exception was
queued by handling vmexit which was due to NMI/interrupt delivery.

Signed-off-by: Liran Alon <liran.alon@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikita Leshenko <nikita.leshchenko@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Krish Sadhukhan <krish.sadhukhan@orcle.com>
[Used a comment from Sean J <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>. - Radim]
Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>