Skip to content
Commit 9e855b1f authored by Paolo Abeni's avatar Paolo Abeni
Browse files

Merge branch 'fix-rtnl_mutex-deadlock-with-dpaa2-and-sfp-modules'



Vladimir Oltean says:

====================
Fix rtnl_mutex deadlock with DPAA2 and SFP modules

This patch set deliberately targets net-next and lacks Fixes: tags due
to caution on my part.

While testing some SFP modules on the Solidrun Honeycomb LX2K platform,
I noticed that rebooting causes a deadlock:

============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
6.1.0-rc5-07010-ga9b9500ffaac-dirty #656 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
systemd-shutdow/1 is trying to acquire lock:
ffffa62db6cf42f0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: rtnl_lock+0x1c/0x30

but task is already holding lock:
ffffa62db6cf42f0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: rtnl_lock+0x1c/0x30

other info that might help us debug this:
 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0
       ----
  lock(rtnl_mutex);
  lock(rtnl_mutex);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

 May be due to missing lock nesting notation

6 locks held by systemd-shutdow/1:
 #0: ffffa62db6863c70 (system_transition_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: __do_sys_reboot+0xd4/0x260
 #1: ffff2f2b0176f100 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: device_shutdown+0xf4/0x260
 #2: ffff2f2b017be900 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: device_shutdown+0x104/0x260
 #3: ffff2f2b017680f0 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: device_release_driver_internal+0x40/0x260
 #4: ffff2f2b0e1608f0 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: device_release_driver_internal+0x40/0x260
 #5: ffffa62db6cf42f0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: rtnl_lock+0x1c/0x30

stack backtrace:
CPU: 6 PID: 1 Comm: systemd-shutdow Not tainted 6.1.0-rc5-07010-ga9b9500ffaac-dirty #656
Hardware name: SolidRun LX2160A Honeycomb (DT)
Call trace:
 lock_acquire+0x68/0x84
 __mutex_lock+0x98/0x460
 mutex_lock_nested+0x2c/0x40
 rtnl_lock+0x1c/0x30
 sfp_bus_del_upstream+0x1c/0xac
 phylink_destroy+0x1c/0x50
 dpaa2_mac_disconnect+0x28/0x70
 dpaa2_eth_remove+0x1dc/0x1f0
 fsl_mc_driver_remove+0x24/0x60
 device_remove+0x70/0x80
 device_release_driver_internal+0x1f0/0x260
 device_links_unbind_consumers+0xe0/0x110
 device_release_driver_internal+0x138/0x260
 device_release_driver+0x18/0x24
 bus_remove_device+0x12c/0x13c
 device_del+0x16c/0x424
 fsl_mc_device_remove+0x28/0x40
 __fsl_mc_device_remove+0x10/0x20
 device_for_each_child+0x5c/0xac
 dprc_remove+0x94/0xb4
 fsl_mc_driver_remove+0x24/0x60
 device_remove+0x70/0x80
 device_release_driver_internal+0x1f0/0x260
 device_release_driver+0x18/0x24
 bus_remove_device+0x12c/0x13c
 device_del+0x16c/0x424
 fsl_mc_bus_remove+0x8c/0x10c
 fsl_mc_bus_shutdown+0x10/0x20
 platform_shutdown+0x24/0x3c
 device_shutdown+0x15c/0x260
 kernel_restart+0x40/0xa4
 __do_sys_reboot+0x1e4/0x260
 __arm64_sys_reboot+0x24/0x30

But fixing this appears to be not so simple. The patch set represents my
attempt to address it.

In short, the problem is that dpaa2_mac_connect() and dpaa2_mac_disconnect()
call 2 phylink functions in a row, one takes rtnl_lock() itself -
phylink_create(), and one which requires rtnl_lock() to be held by the
caller - phylink_fwnode_phy_connect(). The existing approach in the
drivers is too simple. We take rtnl_lock() when calling dpaa2_mac_connect(),
which is what results in the deadlock.

Fixing just that creates another problem. The drivers make use of
rtnl_lock() for serializing with other code paths too. I think I've
found all those code paths, and established other mechanisms for
serializing with them.
====================

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221129141221.872653-1-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
parents 682f560b 87db82cb
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment