Skip to content
Commit 9dbaab56 authored by Chris Wilson's avatar Chris Wilson Committed by Jani Nikula
Browse files

drm/i915: Exit cherryview_irq_handler() after one pass

This effectively reverts

commit 8e5fd599
Author: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Wed Apr 9 13:28:50 2014 +0300

    drm/i915/chv: Make CHV irq handler loop until all interrupts are consumed

as under continuous execlists load we can saturate the IRQ handler,
destablising the tsc clock and triggering the NMI watchdog to declare a hung
CPU.

[  552.756051] clocksource: timekeeping watchdog on CPU0: Marking clocksource 'tsc' as unstable because the skew is too large:
[  552.756080] clocksource:                       'refined-jiffies' wd_now: 10003b480 wd_last: 10003b28c mask: ffffffff
[  552.756091] clocksource:                       'tsc' cs_now: d55d31aa50 cs_last: d17446166c mask: ffffffffffffffff
[  552.756210] clocksource: Switched to clocksource refined-jiffies
[  575.217870] NMI watchdog: Watchdog detected hard LOCKUP on cpu 1
[  575.217893] CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Not tainted 4.5.0-rc7+ #18
[  575.217905] Hardware name:                  /NUC5CPYB, BIOS PYBSWCEL.86A.0027.2015.0507.1758 05/07/2015
[  575.217915]  0000000000000000 ffff88027fd05bc0 ffffffff81288c6d 0000000000000000
[  575.217935]  0000000000000001 ffff88027fd05be0 ffffffff810e72d1 0000000000000000
[  575.217951]  ffff88027fd05c80 ffff88027fd05c20 ffffffff81114b60 0000000181015f1e
[  575.217967] Call Trace:
[  575.217973]  <NMI>  [<ffffffff81288c6d>] dump_stack+0x4f/0x72
[  575.217994]  [<ffffffff810e72d1>] watchdog_overflow_callback+0x151/0x160
[  575.218003]  [<ffffffff81114b60>] __perf_event_overflow+0xa0/0x1e0
[  575.218016]  [<ffffffff811154c4>] perf_event_overflow+0x14/0x20
[  575.218028]  [<ffffffff8101d2ca>] intel_pmu_handle_irq+0x1da/0x460
[  575.218042]  [<ffffffff814a8aae>] ? poll_idle+0x3e/0x70
[  575.218052]  [<ffffffff814a8aae>] ? poll_idle+0x3e/0x70
[  575.218064]  [<ffffffff81014ae8>] perf_event_nmi_handler+0x28/0x50
[  575.218075]  [<ffffffff81007540>] nmi_handle+0x60/0x130
[  575.218086]  [<ffffffff814a8aae>] ? poll_idle+0x3e/0x70
[  575.218096]  [<ffffffff810079c0>] do_nmi+0x140/0x470
[  575.218108]  [<ffffffff81559ec7>] end_repeat_nmi+0x1a/0x1e
[  575.218119]  [<ffffffff814a8aae>] ? poll_idle+0x3e/0x70
[  575.218129]  [<ffffffff814a8aae>] ? poll_idle+0x3e/0x70
[  575.218139]  [<ffffffff814a8aae>] ? poll_idle+0x3e/0x70
[  575.218148]  <<EOE>>  [<ffffffff814a8353>] cpuidle_enter_state+0xf3/0x2f0
[  575.218164]  [<ffffffff814a8587>] cpuidle_enter+0x17/0x20
[  575.218175]  [<ffffffff810aaa3a>] call_cpuidle+0x2a/0x40
[  575.218185]  [<ffffffff810aade3>] cpu_startup_entry+0x273/0x330
[  575.218196]  [<ffffffff81033a1e>] start_secondary+0x10e/0x130

However, not servicing all available IIR within the handler does hurt the
throughput of pathological nop execbuf by about 20%, with a similar effect
upon the dispatch latency of a series of execbuf.

v2: use do {} while(0) for a smaller patch, and easier to revert again

I have reasonable confidence that we do not miss GT interrupts (as
execlists provides a stress case with a failure mechanism easily
detected by igt), however I have less confidence about all the other
sources of interrupts and worry that may lose a display hotplug
interrupt, for example.

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93467


Testcase: igt/gem_exec_nop/basic # requires NMI watchdog
Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Antti Koskipää <antti.koskipaa@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: default avatarTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1457946117-6714-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk


(cherry picked from commit 579de73b)
Signed-off-by: default avatarJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
parent 1e8817b7
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment