Skip to content
Commit 8b88752d authored by Kuniyuki Iwashima's avatar Kuniyuki Iwashima Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman
Browse files

tcp: Fix bind() regression for v6-only wildcard and v4(-mapped-v6) non-wildcard addresses.

commit d91ef1e1 upstream.

Jianguo Wu reported another bind() regression introduced by bhash2.

Calling bind() for the following 3 addresses on the same port, the
3rd one should fail but now succeeds.

  1. 0.0.0.0 or ::ffff:0.0.0.0
  2. [::] w/ IPV6_V6ONLY
  3. IPv4 non-wildcard address or v4-mapped-v6 non-wildcard address

The first two bind() create tb2 like this:

  bhash2 -> tb2(:: w/ IPV6_V6ONLY) -> tb2(0.0.0.0)

The 3rd bind() will match with the IPv6 only wildcard address bucket
in inet_bind2_bucket_match_addr_any(), however, no conflicting socket
exists in the bucket.  So, inet_bhash2_conflict() will returns false,
and thus, inet_bhash2_addr_any_conflict() returns false consequently.

As a result, the 3rd bind() bypasses conflict check, which should be
done against the IPv4 wildcard address bucket.

So, in inet_bhash2_addr_any_conflict(), we must iterate over all buckets.

Note that we cannot add ipv6_only flag for inet_bind2_bucket as it
would confuse the following patetrn.

  1. [::] w/ SO_REUSE{ADDR,PORT} and IPV6_V6ONLY
  2. [::] w/ SO_REUSE{ADDR,PORT}
  3. IPv4 non-wildcard address or v4-mapped-v6 non-wildcard address

The first bind() would create a bucket with ipv6_only flag true,
the second bind() would add the [::] socket into the same bucket,
and the third bind() could succeed based on the wrong assumption
that ipv6_only bucket would not conflict with v4(-mapped-v6) address.

Fixes: 28044fc1

 ("net: Add a bhash2 table hashed by port and address")
Diagnosed-by: default avatarJianguo Wu <wujianguo106@163.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarKuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240326204251.51301-3-kuniyu@amazon.com


Signed-off-by: default avatarJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
parent 690e877c
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment