Skip to content
Commit 6791e0ea authored by James Morse's avatar James Morse Committed by Borislav Petkov (AMD)
Browse files

x86/resctrl: Access per-rmid structures by index



x86 systems identify traffic using the CLOSID and RMID. The CLOSID is
used to lookup the control policy, the RMID is used for monitoring. For
x86 these are independent numbers.
Arm's MPAM has equivalent features PARTID and PMG, where the PARTID is
used to lookup the control policy. The PMG in contrast is a small number
of bits that are used to subdivide PARTID when monitoring. The
cache-occupancy monitors require the PARTID to be specified when
monitoring.

This means MPAM's PMG field is not unique. There are multiple PMG-0, one
per allocated CLOSID/PARTID. If PMG is treated as equivalent to RMID, it
cannot be allocated as an independent number. Bitmaps like rmid_busy_llc
need to be sized by the number of unique entries for this resource.

Treat the combined CLOSID and RMID as an index, and provide architecture
helpers to pack and unpack an index. This makes the MPAM values unique.
The domain's rmid_busy_llc and rmid_ptrs[] are then sized by index, as
are domain mbm_local[] and mbm_total[].

x86 can ignore the CLOSID field when packing and unpacking an index, and
report as many indexes as RMID.

Signed-off-by: default avatarJames Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarBorislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Reviewed-by: default avatarShaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarBabu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarReinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Tested-by: default avatarShaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: default avatarPeter Newman <peternewman@google.com>
Tested-by: default avatarBabu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>
Tested-by: Carl Worth <carl@os.amperecomputing.com> # arm64
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240213184438.16675-7-james.morse@arm.com
Signed-off-by: default avatarBorislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
parent 40fc735b
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment