sched/pelt: Avoid underestimation of task utilization

Lukasz Luba reported that a thread's util_est can significantly decrease as
a result of sharing the CPU with other threads.

The use case can be easily reproduced with a periodic task TA that runs 1ms
and sleeps 100us. When the task is alone on the CPU, its max utilization and
its util_est is around 888. If another similar task starts to run on the
same CPU, TA will have to share the CPU runtime and its maximum utilization
will decrease around half the CPU capacity (512) then TA's util_est will
follow this new maximum trend which is only the result of sharing the CPU
with others tasks.

Such situation can be detected with runnable_avg wich is close or
equal to util_avg when TA is alone, but increases above util_avg when TA
shares the CPU with other threads and wait on the runqueue.

[ We prefer an util_est that overestimate rather than under estimate
  because in 1st case we will not provide enough performance to the
  task which will remain under-provisioned, whereas in the other case we
  will create some idle time which will enable to reduce contention and
  as a result reduces the util_est so the overestimate will be transient
  whereas the underestimate will remain. ]

[ mingo: Refined the changelog, added comments from the LKML discussion. ]

Reported-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAKfTPtDd-HhF-YiNTtL9i5k0PfJbF819Yxu4YquzfXgwi7voyw@mail.gmail.com/#t
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231122140119.472110-1-vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Cc: Hongyan Xia <hongyan.xia2@arm.com>