Skip to content
Commit 096d2301 authored by Qu Wenruo's avatar Qu Wenruo Committed by David Sterba
Browse files

btrfs: refactor main loop in memmove_extent_buffer()



[BACKGROUND]
Currently memove_extent_buffer() does a loop where it strop at any page
boundary inside [dst_offset, dst_offset + len) or [src_offset,
src_offset + len).

This is mostly allowing us to do copy_pages(), but if we're going to use
folios we will need to handle multi-page (the old behavior) or single
folio (the new optimization).

The current code would be a burden for future changes.

[ENHANCEMENT]
Instead of sticking with copy_pages(), here we utilize the new
__write_extent_buffer() helper to handle the writes.

Unlike the refactoring in memcpy_extent_buffer(), we can not just rely
on the write_extent_buffer() and only handle page boundaries inside src
range.

The function write_extent_buffer() itself is still doing forward
writing, thus it cannot handle the following case: (already in the
extent buffer memory operation tests, cross page overlapping run 2)

	Src	Page boundary
	|///////|
	    |///|////|
	    Dst

In the above case, if we just follow page boundary in the src range, we
have no need to do any split, just one __write_extent_buffer() with
use_memmove = true.

But __write_extent_buffer() would split the dst range into two,
so it first copies the beginning part of the src range into the first half
of the dst range.
After this operation, the beginning of the dst range is already updated,
causing corruption.

So we have to follow the old behavior of handling both page boundaries.

And since we're the last caller of copy_pages(), we can remove it
completely.

Signed-off-by: default avatarQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
parent 13840f3f
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment