linux-user: Correct type for LOOP_GET_STATUS{,64} ioctls
The LOOP_GET_STATUS and LOOP_GET_STATUS64 ioctls were incorrectly defined as IOC_W rather than IOC_R, which meant we weren't correctly copying the information back from the kernel to the guest. The loop_info64 structure definition was also missing a member and using the wrong type for several 32-bit fields. In particular, this meant that "kpartx -d image.img" didn't work and "losetup -a" behaved strangely. Correct the ioctl type definitions. Reported-by:Chanho Park <chanho61.park@samsung.com> Reviewed-by:
Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu> Signed-off-by:
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> Signed-off-by:
Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@linaro.org>
Loading
Please register or sign in to comment