Skip to content
Commit fca3f138 authored by Serge Semin's avatar Serge Semin Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman
Browse files

usb: dwc3: ulpi: Replace CPU-based busyloop with Protocol-based one



Originally the procedure of the ULPI transaction finish detection has been
developed as a simple busy-loop with just decrementing counter and no
delays. It's wrong since on different systems the loop will take a
different time to complete. So if the system bus and CPU are fast enough
to overtake the ULPI bus and the companion PHY reaction, then we'll get to
take a false timeout error. Fix this by converting the busy-loop procedure
to take the standard bus speed, address value and the registers access
mode into account for the busy-loop delay calculation.

Here is the way the fix works. It's known that the ULPI bus is clocked
with 60MHz signal. In accordance with [1] the ULPI bus protocol is created
so to spend 5 and 6 clock periods for immediate register write and read
operations respectively, and 6 and 7 clock periods - for the extended
register writes and reads. Based on that we can easily pre-calculate the
time which will be needed for the controller to perform a requested IO
operation. Note we'll still preserve the attempts counter in case if the
DWC USB3 controller has got some internals delays.

[1] UTMI+ Low Pin Interface (ULPI) Specification, Revision 1.1,
    October 20, 2004, pp. 30 - 36.

Fixes: 88bc9d19 ("usb: dwc3: add ULPI interface support")
Acked-by: default avatarHeikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarSerge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201210085008.13264-3-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru


Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
parent ce722da6
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment