vcs: fasync(): make it consistent with poll()
We use POLLPRI not POLLIN to wait for data with poll() as there is never any incoming data stream per se. Let's use the same semantic with fasync() for consistency, including the fact that a vt may go away. No known user space ever relied on the SIGIO reason so far, let alone FASYNC, so the risk of breakage is pretty much nonexistent. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Please register or sign in to comment