tick/nohz: Only check for RCU deferred wakeup on user/guest entry when needed

Checking for and processing RCU-nocb deferred wakeup upon user/guest
entry is only relevant when nohz_full runs on the local CPU, otherwise
the periodic tick should take care of it.

Make sure we don't needlessly pollute these fast-paths as a -3%
performance regression on a will-it-scale.per_process_ops has been
reported so far.

Fixes: 47b8ff19 (entry: Explicitly flush pending rcuog wakeup before last rescheduling point)
Fixes: 4ae7dc97

 (entry/kvm: Explicitly flush pending rcuog wakeup before last rescheduling point)
Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210527113441.465489-1-frederic@kernel.org