scsi: ufs-qcom: remove redundant condition check

Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> reported this:

The patch 9c46b867

: "scsi: ufs-qcom: dump additional testbus
registers" from Feb 3, 2017, leads to the following static checker
warning:

    drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c:1531 ufs_qcom_testbus_cfg_is_ok()
    warn: impossible condition
                '(host->testbus.select_minor > 255) => (0-255 > 255)'

drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c
  1517  static bool ufs_qcom_testbus_cfg_is_ok(struct ufs_qcom_host *host)
  1518  {
  1519          if (host->testbus.select_major >= TSTBUS_MAX) {
  1520               dev_err(host->hba->dev,
  1521                 "%s: UFS_CFG1[TEST_BUS_SEL} may not equal 0x%05X\n",
  1522                  __func__, host->testbus.select_major);
  1523                  return false;
  1524          }
  1525
  1526          /*
  1527           * Not performing check for each individual select_major
  1528           * mappings of select_minor, since there is no harm in
  1529           * configuring a non-existent select_minor
  1530           */
  1531          if (host->testbus.select_minor > 0xFF) {
                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

It might make sense to keep this check.  I don't know.  But it's
confusing that 0xFF is a magic number.  Better to make it a define.

  1532                  dev_err(host->hba->dev,
  1533                       "%s: 0x%05X is not a legal testbus option\n",
  1534                        __func__, host->testbus.select_minor);
  1535                  return false;
  1536          }
  1537
  1538          return true;
  1539  }
---

As data type of "select_minor" is u8, above check is redundant. This
change removes it.

Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>