drm/i915: Introduce concept of a sub-platform
Concept of a sub-platform already exist in our code (like ULX and ULT platform variants and similar),implemented via the macros which check a list of device ids to determine a match. With this patch we consolidate device ids checking into a single function called during early driver load. A few low bits in the platform mask are reserved for sub-platform identification and defined as a per-platform namespace. At the same time it future proofs the platform_mask handling by preparing the code for easy extending, and tidies the very verbose WARN strings generated when IS_PLATFORM macros are embedded into a WARN type statements. v2: Fixed IS_SUBPLATFORM. Updated commit msg. v3: Chris was right, there is an ordering problem. v4: * Catch-up with new sub-platforms. * Rebase for RUNTIME_INFO. * Drop subplatform mask union tricks and convert platform_mask to an array for extensibility. v5: * Fix subplatform check. * Protect against forgetting to expand subplatform bits. * Remove platform enum tallying. * Add subplatform to error state. (Chris) * Drop macros and just use static inlines. * Remove redundant IRONLAKE_M. (Ville) v6: * Split out Ironlake change. * Optimize subplatform check. * Use __always_inline. (Lucas) * Add platform_mask comment. (Paulo) * Pass stored runtime info in error capture. (Chris) v7: * Rebased for new AML ULX device id. * Bump platform mask array size for EHL. * Stop mentioning device ids in intel_device_subplatform_init by using the trick of splitting macros i915_pciids.h. (Jani) * AML seems to be either a subplatform of KBL or CFL so express it like that. v8: * Use one device id table per subplatform. (Jani) Signed-off-by:Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Suggested-by: