Skip to content
Commit 240ad77c authored by Andrea Parri (Microsoft)'s avatar Andrea Parri (Microsoft) Committed by Wei Liu
Browse files

PCI: hv: Prepare hv_compose_msi_msg() for the VMBus-channel-interrupt-to-vCPU...


PCI: hv: Prepare hv_compose_msi_msg() for the VMBus-channel-interrupt-to-vCPU reassignment functionality

The current implementation of hv_compose_msi_msg() is incompatible with
the new functionality that allows changing the vCPU a VMBus channel will
interrupt: if this function always calls hv_pci_onchannelcallback() in
the polling loop, the interrupt going to a different CPU could cause
hv_pci_onchannelcallback() to be running simultaneously in a tasklet,
which will break.  The current code also has a problem in that it is not
synchronized with vmbus_reset_channel_cb(): hv_compose_msi_msg() could
be accessing the ring buffer via the call of hv_pci_onchannelcallback()
well after the time that vmbus_reset_channel_cb() has finished.

Fix these issues as follows.  Disable the channel tasklet before
entering the polling loop in hv_compose_msi_msg() and re-enable it when
done.  This will prevent hv_pci_onchannelcallback() from running in a
tasklet on a different CPU.  Moreover, poll by always calling
hv_pci_onchannelcallback(), but check the channel callback function for
NULL and invoke the callback within a sched_lock critical section.  This
will prevent hv_compose_msi_msg() from accessing the ring buffer after
vmbus_reset_channel_cb() has acquired the sched_lock spinlock.

Suggested-by: default avatarMichael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrea Parri (Microsoft) <parri.andrea@gmail.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Cc: Andrew Murray <amurray@thegoodpenguin.co.uk>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200406001514.19876-8-parri.andrea@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: default avatarMichael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarWei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org>
parent 9403b66e
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment