btrfs: fix backref walking not returning all inode refs

When using the logical to ino ioctl v2, if the flag to ignore offsets of
file extent items (BTRFS_LOGICAL_INO_ARGS_IGNORE_OFFSET) is given, the
backref walking code ends up not returning references for all file offsets
of an inode that point to the given logical bytenr. This happens since
kernel 6.2, commit 6ce6ba53 ("btrfs: use a single argument for extent
offset in backref walking functions") because:

1) It mistakenly skipped the search for file extent items in a leaf that
   point to the target extent if that flag is given. Instead it should
   only skip the filtering done by check_extent_in_eb() - that is, it
   should not avoid the calls to that function (or find_extent_in_eb(),
   which uses it).

2) It was also not building a list of inode extent elements (struct
   extent_inode_elem) if we have multiple inode references for an extent
   when the ignore offset flag is given to the logical to ino ioctl - it
   would leave a single element, only the last one that was found.

These stem from the confusing old interface for backref walking functions
where we had an extent item offset argument that was a pointer to a u64
and another boolean argument that indicated if the offset should be
ignored, but the pointer could be NULL. That NULL case is used by
relocation, qgroup extent accounting and fiemap, simply to avoid building
the inode extent list for each reference, as it's not necessary for those
use cases and therefore avoids memory allocations and some computations.

Fix this by adding a boolean argument to the backref walk context
structure to indicate that the inode extent list should not be built,
make relocation set that argument to true and fix the backref walking
logic to skip the calls to check_extent_in_eb() and find_extent_in_eb()
only if this new argument is true, instead of 'ignore_extent_item_pos'
being true.

A test case for fstests will be added soon, to provide cover not only
for these cases but to the logical to ino ioctl in general as well, as
currently we do not have a test case for it.

Reported-by: Vladimir Panteleev <git@vladimir.panteleev.md>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CAHhfkvwo=nmzrJSqZ2qMfF-rZB-ab6ahHnCD_sq9h4o8v+M7QQ@mail.gmail.com/


Fixes: 6ce6ba53 ("btrfs: use a single argument for extent offset in backref walking functions")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.2+
Tested-by: Vladimir Panteleev <git@vladimir.panteleev.md>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>