Skip to content
Commit 82734c5b authored by Jens Axboe's avatar Jens Axboe
Browse files

io_uring: drop sqd lock before handling signals for SQPOLL



Don't call into get_signal() with the sqd mutex held, it'll fail if we're
freezing the task and we'll get complaints on locks still being held:

====================================
WARNING: iou-sqp-8386/8387 still has locks held!
5.12.0-rc4-syzkaller #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------
1 lock held by iou-sqp-8386/8387:
 #0: ffff88801e1d2470 (&sqd->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: io_sq_thread+0x24c/0x13a0 fs/io_uring.c:6731

 stack backtrace:
 CPU: 1 PID: 8387 Comm: iou-sqp-8386 Not tainted 5.12.0-rc4-syzkaller #0
 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
 Call Trace:
  __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:79 [inline]
  dump_stack+0x141/0x1d7 lib/dump_stack.c:120
  try_to_freeze include/linux/freezer.h:66 [inline]
  get_signal+0x171a/0x2150 kernel/signal.c:2576
  io_sq_thread+0x8d2/0x13a0 fs/io_uring.c:6748

Fold the get_signal() case in with the parking checks, as we need to drop
the lock in both cases, and since we need to be checking for parking when
juggling the lock anyway.

Reported-by: default avatar <syzbot+796d767eb376810256f5@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
Fixes: dbe1bdbb

 ("io_uring: handle signals for IO threads like a normal thread")
Signed-off-by: default avatarJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
parent 51520426
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment