Skip to content
Commit bec9cb90 authored by Maurizio Lombardi's avatar Maurizio Lombardi Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman
Browse files

nvmet-auth: complete a request only after freeing the dhchap pointers

commit f965b281 upstream.

It may happen that the work to destroy a queue
(for example nvmet_tcp_release_queue_work()) is started while
an auth-send or auth-receive command is still completing.

nvmet_sq_destroy() will block, waiting for all the references
to the sq to be dropped, the last reference is then
dropped when nvmet_req_complete() is called.

When this happens, both nvmet_sq_destroy() and
nvmet_execute_auth_send()/_receive() will free the dhchap pointers by
calling nvmet_auth_sq_free().
Since there isn't any lock, the two threads may race against each other,
causing double frees and memory corruptions, as reported by KASAN.

Reproduced by stress blktests nvme/041 nvme/042 nvme/043

 nvme nvme2: qid 0: authenticated with hash hmac(sha512) dhgroup ffdhe4096
 ==================================================================
 BUG: KASAN: double-free in kfree+0xec/0x4b0

 Call Trace:
  <TASK>
  kfree+0xec/0x4b0
  nvmet_auth_sq_free+0xe1/0x160 [nvmet]
  nvmet_execute_auth_send+0x482/0x16d0 [nvmet]
  process_one_work+0x8e5/0x1510

 Allocated by task 191846:
  __kasan_kmalloc+0x81/0xa0
  nvmet_auth_ctrl_sesskey+0xf6/0x380 [nvmet]
  nvmet_auth_reply+0x119/0x990 [nvmet]

 Freed by task 143270:
  kfree+0xec/0x4b0
  nvmet_auth_sq_free+0xe1/0x160 [nvmet]
  process_one_work+0x8e5/0x1510

Fix this bug by calling nvmet_req_complete() only after freeing the
pointers, so we will prevent the race by holding the sq reference.

V2: remove redundant code

Fixes: db1312dd

 ("nvmet: implement basic In-Band Authentication")
Signed-off-by: default avatarMaurizio Lombardi <mlombard@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarKeith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
parent 0ec655ad
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment