x86/kvm: Fix SETcc emulation for return thunks

stable inclusion
from stable-v5.10.133
commit ee4996f07d868ee6cc7e76151dfab9a2344cdeb0
category: bugfix
bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I5PTAS
CVE: CVE-2022-29900,CVE-2022-23816,CVE-2022-29901

Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=ee4996f07d868ee6cc7e76151dfab9a2344cdeb0



--------------------------------

commit af2e140f upstream.

Prepare the SETcc fastop stuff for when RET can be larger still.

The tricky bit here is that the expressions should not only be
constant C expressions, but also absolute GAS expressions. This means
no ?: and 'true' is ~0.

Also ensure em_setcc() has the same alignment as the actual FOP_SETCC()
ops, this ensures there cannot be an alignment hole between em_setcc()
and the first op.

Additionally, add a .skip directive to the FOP_SETCC() macro to fill
any remaining space with INT3 traps; however the primary purpose of
this directive is to generate AS warnings when the remaining space
goes negative. Which is a very good indication the alignment magic
went side-ways.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
[cascardo: ignore ENDBR when computing SETCC_LENGTH]
[cascardo: conflict fixup]
Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Lin Yujun <linyujun809@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Zhang Jianhua <chris.zjh@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Zheng Zengkai <zhengzengkai@huawei.com>