Commit d04ac43b authored by Peter Zijlstra's avatar Peter Zijlstra Committed by Zheng Zengkai
Browse files

x86/retpoline: Create a retpoline thunk array

stable inclusion
from stable-v5.10.133
commit 6eb95718f3ea92affae94401f273b580f6b97372
category: bugfix
bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I5PTAS
CVE: CVE-2022-29900,CVE-2022-23816,CVE-2022-29901

Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=6eb95718f3ea92affae94401f273b580f6b97372



--------------------------------

commit 1a6f7442 upstream.

Stick all the retpolines in a single symbol and have the individual
thunks as inner labels, this should guarantee thunk order and layout.

Previously there were 16 (or rather 15 without rsp) separate symbols and
a toolchain might reasonably expect it could displace them however it
liked, with disregard for their relative position.

However, now they're part of a larger symbol. Any change to their
relative position would disrupt this larger _array symbol and thus not
be sound.

This is the same reasoning used for data symbols. On their own there
is no guarantee about their relative position wrt to one aonther, but
we're still able to do arrays because an array as a whole is a single
larger symbol.

Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: default avatarBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Acked-by: default avatarJosh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Tested-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211026120310.169659320@infradead.org


Signed-off-by: default avatarThadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarBen Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLin Yujun <linyujun809@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarZhang Jianhua <chris.zjh@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarZheng Zengkai <zhengzengkai@huawei.com>
parent 6588e584
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Please to comment